Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: realm: Use aliased addresses for device DMA to shared buffers

[Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>]

Hi Suzuki,

On 2/20/25 8:07 AM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> When a device performs DMA to a shared buffer using physical addresses,
> (without Stage1 translation), the device must use the "{I}PA address" with the
> top bit set in Realm. This is to make sure that a trusted device will be able
> to write to shared buffers as well as the protected buffers. Thus, a Realm must
> always program the full address including the "protection" bit, like AMD SME
> encryption bits.
> 
> Enable this by providing arm64 specific dma_{encrypted,decrypted,clear_encryption}
> helpers for Realms. Please note that the VMM needs to similarly make sure that
> the SMMU Stage2 in the Non-secure world is setup accordingly to map IPA at the
> unprotected alias.
> 
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> index f8f78f622dd2..aeda3bba255e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> @@ -21,4 +21,26 @@ static inline bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
>   	return is_realm_world();
>   }
>   
> +static inline dma_addr_t dma_decrypted(dma_addr_t daddr)
> +{
> +	if (is_realm_world())
> +		daddr |= prot_ns_shared;
> +	return daddr;
> +}
> +#define dma_decrypted dma_decrypted
> +

There is an existing macro (PROT_NS_SHARED), which is preferred to return
prot_ns_shared or 0 depending on the availability of the realm capability.
However, that macro needs to be improved a bit so that it can be used here.
We need to return 0UL to match with the type of prot_ns_shared (unsigned long)

-#define PROT_NS_SHARED         (is_realm_world() ? prot_ns_shared : 0)
+#define PROT_NS_SHARED         (is_realm_world() ? prot_ns_shared : 0UL)

After that, the chunk of code can be as below.

	return daddr | PROT_NS_SHARED;

> +static inline dma_addr_t dma_encrypted(dma_addr_t daddr)
> +{
> +	if (is_realm_world())
> +		daddr &= prot_ns_shared - 1;
> +	return daddr;
> +}
> +#define dma_encrypted dma_encrypted
> +

With PROT_NS_SHARED, it can become something like below. (PROT_NS_SHARED - 1)
is equivalent to -1UL, 'daddr & -1UL' should be fine since it does nothing.

	return daddr & (PROT_NS_SHARED - 1);

> +static inline dma_addr_t dma_clear_encryption(dma_addr_t daddr)
> +{
> +	return dma_encrypted(daddr);
> +}
> +#define dma_clear_encryption dma_clear_encryption
> +
>   #endif	/* __ASM_MEM_ENCRYPT_H */

Thanks,
Gavin