From: "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Ken Chen" <kenchen@google.com>,
"KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"menage@google.com" <menage@google.com>,
"lizf@cn.fujitsu.com" <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
mingo@elte.hu,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] change cpuacct usage percpu format v2
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:42:17 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c73ef954d3030022416d249ba8fefe8e.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <661fca240cb094bcf4d261ccebab9848.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com>
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Ken Chen wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:34 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
>> <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>> "a lot of" ? I talking about cpu hotplug and reading another file as
>>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/present every time before reading this file
>>> gives much much much more overhead ;)
>>
>> yes, really a lot. CPU hotplug is an uncommon event. It happens
>> perhaps once a day? maybe once an hour?
>>
> Are you saying the software should have hotplug script and send SIGHUP or
> some to reload the present map ?
>
>> User monitoring process usually reads usage_percpu at fairly high
>> rate, say once a sec. At each pass it will need to parse N number of
>> CPU index. The overhead is N_CPU * T, where T is time in second
>> between cpu hotplug event. Assume T = one day, on a moderate sized
>> 64-CPU size machine, the overhead is:
>>
>> 64 * 86400 : 1, that's like 5.5 million to 1 ratio. To me that is
>> *high* overhead.
>>
> Sounds strange. I can't catch hat you want to say.
>
Ignore above, I caught, at last. I'll add text to documenation.
BTW, current interface to reset cpuacct (write ops) just reset
specified level of cpuacct and will not clear other hierarchical levels.
Doesn't this behavior confuse software ?
Thanks,
-Kame
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-28 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-27 5:05 [PATCH] change cpuacct usage percpu format KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-27 6:39 ` Balbir Singh
2009-02-27 6:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-27 7:01 ` Balbir Singh
2009-02-27 7:03 ` Li Zefan
2009-02-27 7:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-27 7:29 ` [PATCH] change cpuacct usage percpu format v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-27 7:55 ` Paul Menage
2009-02-27 8:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-27 20:13 ` Ken Chen
2009-02-27 23:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-28 0:00 ` Ken Chen
2009-02-28 0:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-28 0:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-02-28 1:11 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-02-28 5:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-28 9:24 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-02-28 9:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c73ef954d3030022416d249ba8fefe8e.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kenchen@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox