* Re: 5.10.242-rc1 review
2025-09-02 13:21 [PATCH 5.10 00/34] 5.10.242-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-09-02 16:31 ` Brett A C Sheffield
2025-09-02 17:20 ` [PATCH 5.10 00/34] " Florian Fainelli
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Brett A C Sheffield @ 2025-09-02 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Brett A C Sheffield
Broadcast regression confirmed fixed:
https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/20250822165231.4353-4-bacs@librecast.net
# Librecast Test Results
010/010 [ OK ] libmld
120/120 [ OK ] liblibrecast
CPU/kernel: Linux auntie 5.10.242-rc1-00035-g4576ee67df7a #60 SMP Tue Sep 2 16:13:26 -00 2025 x86_64 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
Tested-by: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/34] 5.10.242-rc1 review
2025-09-02 13:21 [PATCH 5.10 00/34] 5.10.242-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-02 16:31 ` Brett A C Sheffield
@ 2025-09-02 17:20 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-09-02 18:03 ` Jon Hunter
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2025-09-02 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie, achill
On 9/2/25 06:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.242 release.
> There are 34 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 04 Sep 2025 13:19:14 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.242-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/34] 5.10.242-rc1 review
2025-09-02 13:21 [PATCH 5.10 00/34] 5.10.242-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-02 16:31 ` Brett A C Sheffield
2025-09-02 17:20 ` [PATCH 5.10 00/34] " Florian Fainelli
@ 2025-09-02 18:03 ` Jon Hunter
2025-09-03 0:47 ` Dominique Martinet
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-09-02 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
linux-tegra, stable
On Tue, 02 Sep 2025 15:21:26 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.242 release.
> There are 34 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 04 Sep 2025 13:19:14 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.242-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
67 tests: 67 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.242-rc1-g4576ee67df7a
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/34] 5.10.242-rc1 review
2025-09-02 13:21 [PATCH 5.10 00/34] 5.10.242-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-02 18:03 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-09-03 0:47 ` Dominique Martinet
2025-09-03 7:45 ` Pavel Machek
2025-09-03 9:44 ` Naresh Kamboju
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dominique Martinet @ 2025-09-03 0:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 03:21:26PM +0200:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.242 release.
> There are 34 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 04 Sep 2025 13:19:14 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.242-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
Tested 4576ee67df7a ("Linux 5.10.242-rc1") on:
- arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640)
- arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4)
No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests:
Tested-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com>
--
Dominique Martinet
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/34] 5.10.242-rc1 review
2025-09-02 13:21 [PATCH 5.10 00/34] 5.10.242-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-03 0:47 ` Dominique Martinet
@ 2025-09-03 7:45 ` Pavel Machek
2025-09-03 9:44 ` Naresh Kamboju
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2025-09-03 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 643 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.242 release.
> There are 34 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
In cooperation with DENX Software Engineering GmbH, HRB 165235 Munich,
Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/34] 5.10.242-rc1 review
2025-09-02 13:21 [PATCH 5.10 00/34] 5.10.242-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-03 7:45 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2025-09-03 9:44 ` Naresh Kamboju
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-09-03 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
On Tue, 2 Sept 2025 at 19:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.242 release.
> There are 34 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 04 Sep 2025 13:19:14 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.242-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.242-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 4576ee67df7a1a73a4ec410a6c8fba6afd0238a3
* git describe: v5.10.241-35-g4576ee67df7a
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.241-35-g4576ee67df7a
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.240-524-gd8db2c8f2fff)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.240-524-gd8db2c8f2fff)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.240-524-gd8db2c8f2fff)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.240-524-gd8db2c8f2fff)
## Test result summary
total: 38282, pass: 31263, fail: 1860, skip: 4969, xfail: 190
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 100 total, 100 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 28 total, 28 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed
* powerpc: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* lava
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread