From: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: fix incorrect rq start_time_ns and alloc_time_ns after throttled
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 18:22:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c82d6bab-36d0-0403-9304-4415f6ffd972@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZH4p8tqFc57_OYoH@slm.duckdns.org>
On 2023/6/6 02:31, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 01:39:19PM +0800, chengming.zhou@linux.dev wrote:
>> From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
>>
>> iocost rely on rq start_time_ns and alloc_time_ns to tell the saturation
>> state of the block device.
>>
>> If any qos ->throttle() end up blocking, the cached rq start_time_ns and
>> alloc_time_ns will include its throtted time, which can confuse its user.
>
> I don't follow. rq_qos_throttle() happens before a request is allocated, so
> whether ->throttle() blocks or not doesn't affect alloc_time_ns or
> start_time_ns.
Yes, most of the time request is allocated after rq_qos_throttle() and its
alloc_time_ns or start_time_ns won't be affected clearly.
But for plug batched allocation introduced by the commit 47c122e35d7e
("block: pre-allocate requests if plug is started and is a batch"), we can
rq_qos_throttle() after the allocation of the request. This is what the
blk_mq_get_cached_request() does.
In this case, the cached request alloc_time_ns or start_time_ns is much ahead
if block in any qos ->throttle().
>
>> This patch add nr_flush counter in blk_plug, so we can tell if the task
>> has throttled in any qos ->throttle(), in which case we need to correct
>> the rq start_time_ns and alloc_time_ns.
>>
>> Another solution may be make rq_qos_throttle() return bool to indicate
>> if it has throttled in any qos ->throttle(). But this need more changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
>
> Depending on the flush behavior and adjusting alloc_time_ns seems fragile to
> me and will likely confuse other users of alloc_time_ns too.
I agree with you, this code is not good. My basic idea is to adjust the cached
request alloc_time_ns and start_time_ns when throttled.
>
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding the problem you're describing. Can you give a
> concrete example of how the current code would misbehave?
>
I tried using fio to reproduce it:
1. set the iocost qos (a bit strict qos setting to reproduce throttle)
echo "259:0 enable=1 rpct=5 rlat=500 wpct=5 wlat=500" > io.cost.qos
2. run fio using io_uring ioengine (for now only io_uring used batched allocation)
fio --name global --runtime 30 --time_based --size 10G --ioengine io_uring \
--iodepth 256 --buffered 0 --sqthread_poll \
--name job1 --rw read --cgroup job1 --numjobs 10 \
--name job2 --rw write --cgroup job2 --numjobs 10
3. run bpftrace to check request start_time_ns
bpftrace -e 'kprobe:__rq_qos_track { $rq = (struct request *)arg1; if ($rq->start_time_ns) { @delta = hist((nsecs - $rq->start_time_ns)/1000); } }'
If we go blk_mq_get_cached_request() -> throttle() and throttled for some time,
then the returned cached request start_time_ns will be much ahead.
Like below: (delta value is us)
@delta:
[0] 170090 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@|
[1] 898 | |
[2, 4) 418 | |
[4, 8) 284 | |
[8, 16) 54 | |
[16, 32) 198 | |
[32, 64) 5416 |@ |
[64, 128) 5082 |@ |
[128, 256) 1296 | |
[256, 512) 23 | |
[512, 1K) 2632 | |
[1K, 2K) 21143 |@@@@@@ |
[2K, 4K) 26349 |@@@@@@@@ |
[4K, 8K) 4559 |@ |
[8K, 16K) 4273 |@ |
[16K, 32K) 14 | |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-06 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-01 5:39 [PATCH] blk-mq: fix incorrect rq start_time_ns and alloc_time_ns after throttled chengming.zhou
2023-06-05 18:31 ` Tejun Heo
2023-06-06 10:22 ` Chengming Zhou [this message]
2023-06-08 22:56 ` Tejun Heo
2023-06-24 15:24 ` Chengming Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c82d6bab-36d0-0403-9304-4415f6ffd972@linux.dev \
--to=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox