From: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 1/4] kernfs: make ->attr.open RCU protected.
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 12:55:14 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8a8a616-da4c-f2ce-0bb2-e0cba69db24d@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YqalHuEB6OjjUosV@slm.duckdns.org>
Hello Tejun,
On 13/6/22 12:46 pm, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 12:36:12PM +1000, Imran Khan wrote:
>>>> +static struct kernfs_open_node *
>>>> +kernfs_check_open_node_protected(struct kernfs_node *kn)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return rcu_dereference_check(kn->attr.open,
>>>> + lockdep_is_held(&kernfs_open_file_mutex));
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> I don't understand why the above is necessary. Whether you're a reader or
>>> writer, you can deref the pointer w/ _protected as long as you're holding
>>> the lock, right?
>>
>> As per [1], we should use rcu_dereference_check() for the reader side when we
>> are holding the lock.
>
> Hmm.... can you quote the exact phrase that you took the above from?
>
I took below phrases as reference:
If the access might be within an RCU read-side critical section on the one hand,
or protected by (say) my_lock on the other, use rcu_dereference_check(), for
example:
p1 = rcu_dereference_check(p->rcu_protected_pointer,
lockdep_is_held(&my_lock));
and
If the access might be within an RCU read-side critical section on the one hand,
or protected by either my_lock or your_lock on the other, again use
rcu_dereference_check(), for example:
p1 = rcu_dereference_check(p->rcu_protected_pointer,
lockdep_is_held(&my_lock) ||
lockdep_is_held(&your_lock));
Thanks,
-- Imran
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-13 2:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-02 6:39 [PATCH RESEND v4 0/4] kernfs: make ->attr.open RCU protected Imran Khan
2022-06-02 6:39 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 1/4] " Imran Khan
2022-06-12 17:58 ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-13 2:36 ` Imran Khan
2022-06-13 2:46 ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-13 2:55 ` Imran Khan [this message]
2022-06-13 3:09 ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-13 3:56 ` Imran Khan
2022-06-13 17:30 ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-14 2:31 ` Imran Khan
2022-06-02 6:39 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 2/4] kernfs: Change kernfs_notify_list to llist Imran Khan
2022-06-02 6:39 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 3/4] kernfs: Introduce interface to access global kernfs_open_file_mutex Imran Khan
2022-06-02 6:39 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 4/4] kernfs: Replace global kernfs_open_file_mutex with hashed mutexes Imran Khan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c8a8a616-da4c-f2ce-0bb2-e0cba69db24d@oracle.com \
--to=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox