From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751236AbdARWuE (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:50:04 -0500
Received: from mail-pg0-f67.google.com ([74.125.83.67]:32891 "EHLO
        mail-pg0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750932AbdARWt7 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:49:59 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: smp: Remove CPU: shutdown notice
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
References: <20170117230714.6799-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
 <20170117232314.GI27312@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
 <fd4a4f48-f19e-dcac-c286-8e03db89e99a@gmail.com>
 <20170118223948.GR27312@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <c91c2cc7-d516-2dec-ccd8-9b36b6644f24@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:49:55 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170118223948.GR27312@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 01/18/2017 02:39 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 03:39:45PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Well, for one it's inconsistent, and it also leaves room for subtle
>> timing/caching issues with some platforms (OK, maybe not so much).
>> Improving the speed and consistency was the primary motive.
> 
> Actually, it's not as inconsistent as you claim.
> 
> c68b0274fb3c ("ARM: reduce "Booted secondary processor" message to debug level")
> dropped the corresponding pr_info() in the bringup path to debug level,
> so to be consistent, this one should be dropped to debug level too.
> 
> Removing it arguably makes it more inconsistent!

OK, fair point, I missed that one.

> 
> So, I'd be willing to accept a patch lowering this to a pr_debug()
> to make it more consistent with the bringup path, but otherwise the
> consistency argument doesn't really stand.

Sounds good, thanks!
-- 
Florian