linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: ziy@nvidia.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] khugepaged: Optimize collapse_pte_mapped_thp() by PTE batching
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 18:17:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c9a34cf3-96a5-4a92-8e4c-34d67b1d3fe8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250722150559.96465-4-dev.jain@arm.com>

On 22.07.25 17:05, Dev Jain wrote:
> Use PTE batching to optimize collapse_pte_mapped_thp().
> 
> On arm64, suppose khugepaged is scanning a pte-mapped 2MB THP for collapse.
> Then, calling ptep_clear() for every pte will cause a TLB flush for every
> contpte block. Instead, clear_ptes() does a contpte_try_unfold_partial()
> which will flush the TLB only for the (if any) starting and ending contpte
> block, if they partially overlap with the range khugepaged is looking at.
> 
> For all arches, there should be a benefit due to batching atomic operations
> on mapcounts due to folio_remove_rmap_ptes() and saving some calls.

Please simplify that (and make it less arm specific) like suggested for 
patch #2.

PTE batching has known benefits on all architectures :)

> 
> Note that we do not need to make a change to the check
> "if (folio_page(folio, i) != page)"; if i'th page of the folio is equal
> to the first page of our batch, then i + 1, .... i + nr_batch_ptes - 1
> pages of the folio will be equal to the corresponding pages of our
> batch mapping consecutive pages.

Yeah, that must stay to make the comment from "step 1" happy.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
> ---
>   mm/khugepaged.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index 63517ef7eafb..1ff0c7dd2be4 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -1503,15 +1503,16 @@ static int set_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
>   int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>   			    bool install_pmd)
>   {
> +	int nr_mapped_ptes = 0, nr_batch_ptes, result = SCAN_FAIL;
>   	struct mmu_notifier_range range;
>   	bool notified = false;
>   	unsigned long haddr = addr & HPAGE_PMD_MASK;
> +	unsigned long end = haddr + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE;
>   	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vma_lookup(mm, haddr);
>   	struct folio *folio;
>   	pte_t *start_pte, *pte;
>   	pmd_t *pmd, pgt_pmd;
>   	spinlock_t *pml = NULL, *ptl;
> -	int nr_ptes = 0, result = SCAN_FAIL;
>   	int i;
>   
>   	mmap_assert_locked(mm);
> @@ -1625,11 +1626,15 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>   		goto abort;
>   
>   	/* step 2: clear page table and adjust rmap */
> -	for (i = 0, addr = haddr, pte = start_pte;
> -	     i < HPAGE_PMD_NR; i++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, pte++) {
> +	for (i = 0, addr = haddr, pte = start_pte; i < HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> +	     i += nr_batch_ptes, addr += nr_batch_ptes * PAGE_SIZE,
> +	     pte += nr_batch_ptes) {
 > +		int max_nr_batch_ptes = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;>   		struct 
page *page;
>   		pte_t ptent = ptep_get(pte);
>   
> +		nr_batch_ptes = 1;
> +
>   		if (pte_none(ptent))
>   			continue;
>   		/*
> @@ -1643,26 +1648,29 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>   			goto abort;
>   		}
>   		page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, ptent);
> +
>   		if (folio_page(folio, i) != page)
>   			goto abort;
>   
> +		nr_batch_ptes = folio_pte_batch(folio, pte, ptent, max_nr_batch_ptes);

Same comment regarding matching types for folio_pte_batch(), now that we 
changed that -- unsigned int.

> +
>   		/*
>   		 * Must clear entry, or a racing truncate may re-remove it.
>   		 * TLB flush can be left until pmdp_collapse_flush() does it.
>   		 * PTE dirty? Shmem page is already dirty; file is read-only.
>   		 */
> -		ptep_clear(mm, addr, pte);
> -		folio_remove_rmap_pte(folio, page, vma);
> -		nr_ptes++;
> +		clear_ptes(mm, addr, pte, nr_batch_ptes);
> +		folio_remove_rmap_ptes(folio, page, nr_batch_ptes, vma);
> +		nr_mapped_ptes += nr_batch_ptes;
>   	}
>   
>   	if (!pml)
>   		spin_unlock(ptl);
>   
>   	/* step 3: set proper refcount and mm_counters. */
> -	if (nr_ptes) {
> -		folio_ref_sub(folio, nr_ptes);
> -		add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(folio), -nr_ptes);
> +	if (nr_mapped_ptes) {
> +		folio_ref_sub(folio, nr_mapped_ptes);
> +		add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(folio), -nr_mapped_ptes);
>   	}
>   
>   	/* step 4: remove empty page table */
> @@ -1695,10 +1703,10 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>   			: SCAN_SUCCEED;
>   	goto drop_folio;
>   abort:
> -	if (nr_ptes) {
> +	if (nr_mapped_ptes) {
>   		flush_tlb_mm(mm);
> -		folio_ref_sub(folio, nr_ptes);
> -		add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(folio), -nr_ptes);
> +		folio_ref_sub(folio, nr_mapped_ptes);
> +		add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(folio), -nr_mapped_ptes);

Doing the TLB flush and adjusting the refcount after dropping the PTL 
... interesting. Well, nothing surprises me in khugpaged code anymore.

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-22 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-22 15:05 [PATCH v3 0/3] Optimizations for khugepaged Dev Jain
2025-07-22 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm: add get_and_clear_ptes() and clear_ptes() Dev Jain
2025-07-22 20:47   ` Andrew Morton
2025-07-23  4:01     ` Dev Jain
2025-07-23  3:29   ` Baolin Wang
2025-07-22 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] khugepaged: Optimize __collapse_huge_page_copy_succeeded() by PTE batching Dev Jain
2025-07-22 16:03   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-23  4:04     ` Dev Jain
2025-07-23  3:40   ` Baolin Wang
2025-07-22 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] khugepaged: Optimize collapse_pte_mapped_thp() " Dev Jain
2025-07-22 16:17   ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-07-23  3:47   ` Baolin Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c9a34cf3-96a5-4a92-8e4c-34d67b1d3fe8@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).