Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] iio: envelope-detector: ADC driver based on a DAC and a comparator

Peter Rosin
2016-11-11T12:10:37Z

On 2016-11-09 16:06, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2016, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2016-11-08 22:47, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> I don't think you need extra race handling with that, but I might be wrong
>>> as usual.
>>
>> There's obviously no way to determine which of the timeout or the
>> interrupt that happens first without some race handling, so I don't
>> know what you mean? If the timeout happens first, there is also a
>> need to handle late hits from the irq that might come in during the
>> preparation for the next step in the binary search. It gets messy
>> quickly compared to the simplicity of the current implementation.
>
> Gah, forgot about that timeout thingy. Fair enough.
>
> Feel free to add an
>
> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Thanks for looking!

Cheers,
Peter