From: Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
brgerst@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] x86/ia32: Leave NULL selector values 0~3 as is
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 23:55:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cace0bfa-2de7-431b-9b4d-fd8ca5e7873d@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb5f75e3-0882-4baa-be32-f363a8e411d8@citrix.com>
On 2/14/2025 6:01 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 14/02/2025 6:56 am, Xin Li wrote:
>> On 12/12/2024 10:44 AM, Xin Li wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2024 10:45 AM, Xin Li (Intel) wrote:
>>>> The first GDT descriptor is reserved as 'NULL descriptor'. As bits 0
>>>> and 1 of a segment selector, i.e., the RPL bits, are NOT used to index
>>>> GDT, selector values 0~3 all point to the NULL descriptor, thus values
>>>> 0, 1, 2 and 3 are all valid NULL selector values.
>>>>
>>>> When a NULL selector value is to be loaded into a segment register,
>>>> reload_segments() sets its RPL bits. Later IRET zeros ES, FS, GS, and
>>>> DS segment registers if any of them is found to have any nonzero NULL
>>>> selector value. The two operations offset each other to actually
>>>> effect
>>>> a nop.
>>>>
>>>> Besides, zeroing of RPL in NULL selector values is an information leak
>>>> in pre-FRED systems as userspace can spot any interrupt/exception by
>>>> loading a nonzero NULL selector, and waiting for it to become zero.
>>>> But there is nothing software can do to prevent it before FRED.
>>>>
>>>> ERETU, the only legit instruction to return to userspace from kernel
>>>> under FRED, by design does NOT zero any segment register to avoid this
>>>> problem behavior.
>>>>
>>>> As such, leave NULL selector values 0~3 as is.
>>>
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> Do you have any more comments?
>>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> Are you okay to give a review-by to this patch?
>
> Apologies.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Thank you very much!
Thanks!
Xin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-19 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-26 18:45 [PATCH v4 1/1] x86/ia32: Leave NULL selector values 0~3 as is Xin Li (Intel)
2024-12-12 18:44 ` Xin Li
2025-02-14 6:56 ` Xin Li
2025-02-14 14:01 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-02-19 7:55 ` Xin Li [this message]
2025-02-27 21:54 ` [tip: x86/asm] x86/ia32: Leave NULL selector values 0~3 unchanged tip-bot2 for Xin Li (Intel)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cace0bfa-2de7-431b-9b4d-fd8ca5e7873d@zytor.com \
--to=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox