From: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.sf.net
Subject: Re: [resend] i915: high power consumption after suspend/resume
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:55:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb0375e10910301155s5e2b2e79t562bfa798ba75e23@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091030083742.48f5d4f3@jbarnes-g45>
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:25:21 -0400
> Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I just suspended and resumed and power consumption stayed low. I'll
>> > try and get an intel_reg_dumper diff next time I trigger this bug.
>>
>> intel_reg_dumper blames RENCLK_GATE_D2. Patch coming.
>>
>> Maybe my BIOS doesn't always reset it.
>
> Does resetting that reg get your power savings back?
Surprisingly, no. With my kernel patched to restore it on resume, I
still see high power consumption, and rebinding still fixes it. (As
an aside, I think hat i915's ability to survive rebinding without
crashing on the next X startup has gotten worse recently. I
invariably OOPS awhile after rebinding with recent kernels.)
I diffed the output of intel_reg_dumper (2.9.0, I think):
--- /tmp/pre-rebind 2009-10-30 14:35:24.267236469 -0400
+++ /tmp/post-rebind 2009-10-30 14:39:22.649986477 -0400
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
(II): PFIT_CONTROL: 0x00000000
(II): PFIT_PGM_RATIOS: 0x00000000
(II): PORT_HOTPLUG_EN: 0x3e040320
-(II): PORT_HOTPLUG_STAT: 0x38560800
+(II): PORT_HOTPLUG_STAT: 0x38000000
(II): DSPACNTR: 0x00000000 (disabled, pipe A)
(II): DSPASTRIDE: 0x00000000 (0 bytes)
(II): DSPAPOS: 0x00000000 (0, 0)
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@
(II): FBC_COMMAND: 0x08c80034
(II): FBC_STATUS: 0x00000000
(II): FBC_CONTROL2: 0x00000000
-(II): FBC_FENCE_OFF: 0x00008000
+(II): FBC_FENCE_OFF: 0x10000000
(II): FBC_MOD_NUM: 0x00000060
(II): MI_MODE: 0x00000200
(II): MI_ARB_STATE: 0x00000040
intel_reg_write doesn't seem to work right on FBC_FENCE_OFF (previous
value doesn't agree w/ intel_reg_dumper), and I'm not sure exactly
what that's supposed to do.
--Andy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-30 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-03 16:39 i915: high power consumption after suspend/resume Andrew Lutomirski
2009-10-03 16:50 ` [resend] " Andrew Lutomirski
2009-10-05 16:21 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-10-08 3:44 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2009-10-29 16:47 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-10-29 17:22 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2009-10-29 17:40 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2009-10-30 6:25 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2009-10-30 15:37 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-10-30 18:55 ` Andrew Lutomirski [this message]
2009-11-05 4:00 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2009-11-05 16:28 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-11-06 20:25 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2009-11-06 21:57 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-11-10 14:42 ` Andrew Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb0375e10910301155s5e2b2e79t562bfa798ba75e23@mail.gmail.com \
--to=luto@mit.edu \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sf.net \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox