From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: german.gomez@arm.com, james.clark@arm.com,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/perf: arm_spe: Fix consistency of SYS_PMSCR_EL1.CX
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:48:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb5bd640-cb53-4926-fe32-bbcf41e8632a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220712051404.2546851-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
On 12/07/2022 06:14, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> The arm_spe_pmu driver will enable SYS_PMSCR_EL1.CX in order to add CONTEXT
> packets into the traces, if the owner of the perf event runs with required
> capabilities i.e CAP_PERFMON or CAP_SYS_ADMIN via perfmon_capable() helper.
>
> The value of this bit is computed in the arm_spe_event_to_pmscr() function
> but the check for capabilities happens in the pmu event init callback i.e
> arm_spe_pmu_event_init(). This suggests that the value of the CX bit should
> remain consistent for the duration of the perf session.
>
> However, the function arm_spe_event_to_pmscr() may be called later during
> the event start callback i.e arm_spe_pmu_start() when the "current" process
> is not the owner of the perf session, hence the CX bit setting is currently
> not consistent.
>
> One way to fix this, is by caching the required value of the CX bit during
> the initialization of the PMU event, so that it remains consistent for the
> duration of the session. It uses currently unused 'event->hw.flags' element
> to cache perfmon_capable() value, which can be referred during event start
> callback to compute SYS_PMSCR_EL1.CX. This ensures consistent availability
> of context packets in the trace as per event owner capabilities.
>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
> This applies on v5.19-rc6 and built on an earlier version posted by German
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220117124432.3119132-1-german.gomez@arm.com/
>
> drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> index db670b265897..011e98428233 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,26 @@
> #include <asm/mmu.h>
> #include <asm/sysreg.h>
>
> +/*
> + * event.hw.flags remain unused for events created for this
> + * PMU driver. A single bit there i.e BIT(0), could be used
> + * to remember initiating process's perfmon_capable() value
> + * which can be subsequently used to enable SYS_PMSCR_EL.CX
> + * thus enabling context information in the trace.
Please could we rephrase this :
/*
* Cache if the event is allowed to trace Context information.
* This allows us to perform the check, i.e, perfmon_capable(),
* in the context of the event owner, once, during the event_init().
*/
> + */
> +#define SPE_PMU_HW_FLAGS_CX BIT(0)
> +
> +static void event_hw_flags_set_cx(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + if (perfmon_capable())
> + event->hw.flags |= SPE_PMU_HW_FLAGS_CX;
> +}
> +
> +static bool event_hw_flags_has_cx(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + return !!(event->hw.flags & SPE_PMU_HW_FLAGS_CX);
> +}
> +
super minor nit:
set_event_has_cx();
get_event_has_cx();
?
Also, please could we fold the CONFIG_PID_IN_CONTEXTIDR check
into the helpers ?
> #define ARM_SPE_BUF_PAD_BYTE 0
>
> struct arm_spe_pmu_buf {
> @@ -272,7 +292,7 @@ static u64 arm_spe_event_to_pmscr(struct perf_event *event)
> if (!attr->exclude_kernel)
> reg |= BIT(SYS_PMSCR_EL1_E1SPE_SHIFT);
>
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PID_IN_CONTEXTIDR) && perfmon_capable())
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PID_IN_CONTEXTIDR) && event_hw_flags_has_cx(event))
> reg |= BIT(SYS_PMSCR_EL1_CX_SHIFT);
i.e,
if (event_has_cx(event))
....
Otherwise looks good to me.
Suzuki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-12 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-12 5:14 [PATCH] drivers/perf: arm_spe: Fix consistency of SYS_PMSCR_EL1.CX Anshuman Khandual
2022-07-12 5:29 ` itaru.kitayama
2022-07-12 5:55 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-07-12 6:02 ` itaru.kitayama
2022-07-12 7:49 ` German Gomez
2022-07-12 9:48 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2022-07-12 12:32 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb5bd640-cb53-4926-fe32-bbcf41e8632a@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=german.gomez@arm.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox