Re: [PATCH v6 11/24] x86/resctrl: Move CLOSID/RMID matching and setting to use helpers

Reinette Chatre
2023-10-03T21:15:20Z

Hi James,

On 9/14/2023 10:21 AM, James Morse wrote:
> When switching tasks, the CLOSID and RMID that the new task should
> use are stored in struct task_struct. For x86 the CLOSID known by resctrl,
> the value in task_struct, and the value written to the CPU register are
> all the same thing.
>
> MPAM's CPU interface has two different PARTID's one for data accesses
> the other for instruction fetch. Storing resctrl's CLOSID value in
> struct task_struct implies the arch code knows whether resctrl is using
> CDP.
>
> Move the matching and setting of the struct task_struct properties
> to use helpers. This allows arm64 to store the hardware format of
> the register, instead of having to convert it each time.
>
> __rdtgroup_move_task()s use of READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() ensures torn
> values aren't seen as another CPU may schedule the task being moved
> while the value is being changed. MPAM has an additional corner-case
> here as the PMG bits extend the PARTID space. If the scheduler sees a
> new-CLOSID but old-RMID, the task will dirty an RMID that the limbo code
> is not watching causing an inaccurate count. x86's RMID are independent
> values, so the limbo code will still be watching the old-RMID in this
> circumstance.
> To avoid this, arm64 needs both the CLOSID/RMID WRITE_ONCE()d together.
> Both values must be provided together.
>
> Because MPAM's RMID values are not unique, the CLOSID must be provided
> when matching the RMID.
>
> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>
> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>
> Tested-By: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>

Reinette