From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31F5E27A457; Tue, 6 May 2025 11:25:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746530758; cv=none; b=gcQo0d7cEV44cC23fxapHW/1fUI+fdOliW0cFUXJJKZCPUOMOQN+fceeTbRXO9WYE/TF9rblWJwCY7acAkrKT6qr3T+07o0PtCsYQz8FAICJPouCHOnS8FQLB1o58karSMKzdQyYTjDi6Frwm7Po/Mt+nPzcf4bXacrpaFW0qco= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746530758; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XgTcwR/r+H6X7/Vl3b1xNmXP3hP0XvRCLfIkPJ8BL94=; h=From:Date:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=V2PbV9dcFh5i7vrxaQ0lhjYA4C2Pr1/tRV+koooR+fMsGSu1m0klarPV5DrOoo9t1EkGtmWVEzgav4pwo6FXG5BB1e5laX+2EEsQtgazey1dJgXB6rc6D9PpkPkDpTJz1f28jRXOh0if54Jm2zgwGTxSDTJCFdzx8gFCvT1wtR0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=VvyW678R; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="VvyW678R" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1746530758; x=1778066758; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=XgTcwR/r+H6X7/Vl3b1xNmXP3hP0XvRCLfIkPJ8BL94=; b=VvyW678RCMmcVy+g9N6ul4LaULTWoBpIAYk4/jPaynTVJFwUNFl/TDWz Ghku7z8pqKDkueLDRhQ9m8zundcsxv4bGDtYIQESdxGm3I+kuJesv7LvH 7skrcZJ4fT4X5RZJMSryz+gbaw4SPaSUHyc0eoT2POVe4Z3EERuOEuwWM AW6O3YAB55gDshgM3JSHPltG2H+GPy+E3SvRkkS/WsfJo+GUn3eZqcApz xOEKCuBZjFFfg16L+NUlzEVpduzKj5ejiJ3ryceGC53tPPe6t62gK6N1R wD1nRxxvv0nUsobKaXZz/kuIwo0gEjRjMtU7RVPX8wentZTpT7Q8LqZvU A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: UeJShn9IScWbG/+GOIq+sw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Ek9DgO0JQ165FY0VVIjEKw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11424"; a="48100769" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,266,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="48100769" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 May 2025 04:25:57 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: qzo0UWuWQwK0jmC1MsNUog== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7/ub2ltuQVaMlzkbDRaidA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,266,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="135973628" Received: from ijarvine-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.207]) by fmviesa008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 May 2025 04:25:54 -0700 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 14:25:51 +0300 (EEST) To: Randy Dunlap cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 5 (drivers/pci/pcie/bwctrl.c) In-Reply-To: <0ab5fe5d-feda-4a3a-8803-92eb4e52e3b4@infradead.org> Message-ID: References: <20250505184148.210cf0aa@canb.auug.org.au> <0ab5fe5d-feda-4a3a-8803-92eb4e52e3b4@infradead.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Mon, 5 May 2025, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 5/5/25 1:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20250502: > > > > on x86_64: > > drivers/pci/pcie/bwctrl.c:56:22: warning: 'pcie_bwctrl_lbms_rwsem' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] > 56 | static DECLARE_RWSEM(pcie_bwctrl_lbms_rwsem); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/rwsem.h:153:29: note: in definition of macro 'DECLARE_RWSEM' > 153 | struct rw_semaphore lockname = __RWSEM_INITIALIZER(lockname) > | ^~~~~~~~ Thank for the heads up, I don't know what I was thinking. I remove all code related to that rwsem but forgot to remove the rwsem itself. I'll send a patch once our build tester has had the opportunity to check it. -- i.