Re: TCP-RST Vulnerability - Doubt

["Miquel van Smoorenburg" <miquels@cistron.nl>]

In article <20040625150532.1a6d6e60.davem@redhat.com>,
David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com> wrote:
>RFC2385 MD5 hashing support is going in soon, and for the application where
>the vulnerability actually matters (BGP sessions between backbone routers)
>MD5 clears that problem right up and they're all using MD5 protection already
>anyways.

MD5 protection on BGP sessions isn't very common yet. MD5 uses CPU,
and routers don't usually have much of that. Which means that now an
MD5 CPU attack is possible instead of a TCP RST attack.

The "TTL hack" solution is safer. Make sure sender uses a TTL
of 255, on the receiver discard all packets with a TTL < 255.
You can use iptables to implement that on a Linux box.

Mike.