From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266217AbUGASjf (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:39:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266218AbUGASjf (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:39:35 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:20913 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266217AbUGASje (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:39:34 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe" Subject: Re: framebuffer + fbtv + X kills system Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:39:31 +0200 Organization: Technische Universitaet Ilmenau, Germany Message-ID: References: X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd952a595.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: > I'm further running a XFree86 X-Server (with `Driver "tdfx"', > `Option "UseFBDev" "true"', `DefaultDepth 24' and `Modes Hm, replying to myself :) I finally discovered, that using XFree with Driver !fbdev and Option UseFBDev true doesn't really mean that the framebuffer has total display control. So it could be, that this is it what finally confuses the framebuffer. Sorry for the inconvenience (and the long mail around it :)). regards, Mario -- User sind wie ideale Gase - sie verteilen sich gleichmaessig ueber alle Platten