From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C216BC54FCB for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDA22078C for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="LvYzhnzD" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726441AbgD0RYe (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:24:34 -0400 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]:35780 "EHLO lelv0142.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725995AbgD0RY2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:24:28 -0400 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 03RHOPni100638; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:24:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1588008265; bh=9UEkuR/F2nJaZ9wLLT/hIPP/2KeRKFLLW96e8JrFuKM=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=LvYzhnzDjvga2+5vXnZmr9ou4Q5SchJQuQMqfywvt3XDupiB+VG8rfwjXVu8muz5L RqxgONEB8x4r3jUtM3VIZY+2oFlQDcqynaPvM69LYwYu9ZpsWiFkIxUYpazCCrDQ4P gOqkGBGlwQz5LgO/ODVHQL4LMovfZfQW8I0kfbpQ= Received: from DLEE105.ent.ti.com (dlee105.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.35]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 03RHOPV1097264 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:24:25 -0500 Received: from DLEE112.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.23) by DLEE105.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:24:25 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DLEE112.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:24:25 -0500 Received: from [10.250.52.63] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 03RHOOAl069509; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:24:24 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 00/17] Multicolor Framework (array edition) To: Pavel Machek CC: , , References: <20200423155524.13971-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20200425204825.GG23926@amd> From: Dan Murphy Message-ID: Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:18:31 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200425204825.GG23926@amd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel On 4/25/20 3:48 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >> This is the multi color LED framework. This framework presents clustered >> colored LEDs into an array and allows the user space to adjust the brightness >> of the cluster using a single file write. The individual colored LEDs >> intensities are controlled via a single file that is an array of >> LEDs > Thanks for the series. Thank you for taking the time to review this series.  I would prefer them to all go in at the same time as the LP50xx and LP55xx devices were tested incrementally and together as a full series. I need to check back a few series patches 8->10 may have acks from maintainers but may have gotten lost.  If I find the maintainer ack I will post the URL where they ack'd it if not I will ask the maintainer for their review and ACK. Dan > > I believe 6/, 11/, 15/, 16/ could be applied now. Should I do that? > > 8..10/ might be ready, too... but I'm not relevant maintainer, so > you'll need to push them separately. I added my acks. > > Best regards, > Pavel