From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: luto@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
efault@gmx.de, songliubraving@fb.com, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:10:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc686b67-73f4-606b-9df3-3fe63d85195a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180620195652.27251-2-riel@surriel.com>
On 06/20/2018 12:56 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> /*
> - * FIXME! The "sizeof(struct mm_struct)" currently includes the
> - * whole struct cpumask for the OFFSTACK case. We could change
> - * this to *only* allocate as much of it as required by the
> - * maximum number of CPU's we can ever have. The cpumask_allocation
> - * is at the end of the structure, exactly for that reason.
> + * The mm_cpumask is located at the end of mm_struct, and is
> + * dynamically sized based on nr_cpu_ids.
> */
> + mm_size = sizeof(struct mm_struct) + cpumask_size();
> +
> mm_cachep = kmem_cache_create_usercopy("mm_struct",
> - sizeof(struct mm_struct), ARCH_MIN_MMSTRUCT_ALIGN,
> + mm_size, ARCH_MIN_MMSTRUCT_ALIGN,
Could you add a bit to that comment, like "dynamically sized based on
nr_cpu_ids" ... which is sized based on the number of possible CPUs.
I found myself wondering how that interacts with hotplug.
t mm_struct, saved_auxv),
> diff --git a/mm/init-mm.c b/mm/init-mm.c
> index f94d5d15ebc0..20fe222fe4c0 100644
> --- a/mm/init-mm.c
> +++ b/mm/init-mm.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,15 @@
> #define INIT_MM_CONTEXT(name)
> #endif
>
> +/*
> + * For dynamically allocated mm_structs, there is a dynamically sized cpumask
> + * at the end of the structure, the size of which depends on nr_cpu_ids. That...
Similar nit. Instead of calling out the variable alone, could we just
say what it means logically and then reference the variable?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-22 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-20 19:56 [PATCH 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 21:32 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-21 20:18 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-21 0:24 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-22 15:10 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2018-06-22 17:45 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86,tlb: leave lazy TLB mode at page table free time Rik van Riel
2018-06-21 0:23 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-22 14:58 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-22 15:17 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86,tlb: change tlbstate.is_lazy to tlbstate.state Rik van Riel
2018-06-22 17:01 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-22 17:08 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86,tlb: make lazy TLB mode lazier Rik van Riel
2018-06-22 15:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-22 15:15 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-22 15:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-22 17:05 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-22 17:16 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86,tlb: only send page table free TLB flush to lazy TLB CPUs Rik van Riel
2018-06-22 17:23 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86,mm: always use lazy TLB mode Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86,idle: do not leave mm in idle state Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 22:20 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-21 0:25 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-22 15:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-22 15:53 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-22 16:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-22 20:18 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-22 22:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-23 0:55 ` Rik van Riel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-29 14:29 [PATCH v3 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-06-29 14:29 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids Rik van Riel
2018-06-30 4:30 ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-06 21:56 [PATCH v4 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-07-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids Rik van Riel
2018-07-07 8:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-07-07 21:25 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-08 14:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-07-08 14:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-07-09 21:38 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-10 3:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-07-10 14:28 [PATCH v5 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-07-10 14:28 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids Rik van Riel
2018-07-15 22:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-07-15 23:50 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-16 1:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-07-16 19:03 [PATCH v6 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-07-16 19:03 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids Rik van Riel
2018-08-04 22:28 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc686b67-73f4-606b-9df3-3fe63d85195a@linux.intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).