From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Zach Brown <zach.brown@ni.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: handle state correctly in phy_stop_machine
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:45:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cca58f8b-0d9b-fb17-2ba3-2fd11bf88efe@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3696191-fabc-d150-eb3f-df60f3bcfbe3@gmail.com>
On 03/23/2017 02:41 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 03/22/2017 01:27 PM, Zach Brown wrote:
>> From: Nathan Sullivan <nathan.sullivan@ni.com>
>>
>> If the PHY is halted on stop, then do not set the state to PHY_UP. This
>> ensures the phy will be restarted later in phy_start when the machine is
>> started again.
>
> So essentially what you want to "defeat" here is entering phy_start()
> with PHY_UP therefore not run this part:
>
> case PHY_HALTED:
> /* make sure interrupts are re-enabled for the PHY */
> if (phydev->irq != PHY_POLL) {
> err = phy_enable_interrupts(phydev);
> if (err < 0)
> break;
> }
>
> phydev->state = PHY_RESUMING;
> do_resume = true;
> break;
>
> which is what re-enables interrupts and makes sure the PHY is resumed,
> right?
>
> If that's the scenario, I guess:
>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
And almost forgot:
Fixes: 00db8189d984 ("This patch adds a PHY Abstraction Layer to the
Linux Kernel, enabling ethernet drivers to remain as ignorant as is
reasonable of the connected PHY's design and operation details.")
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-23 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-22 20:27 [PATCH] net: phy: handle state correctly in phy_stop_machine Zach Brown
2017-03-23 21:25 ` David Miller
2017-03-23 21:41 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-23 21:45 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2017-03-24 19:27 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cca58f8b-0d9b-fb17-2ba3-2fd11bf88efe@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zach.brown@ni.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox