From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
kernel@collabora.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: iommu: add config needed for iommufd_fail_nth
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 01:13:45 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ccab9229-c0de-4c38-bb5c-7f32cbd7fa2b@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240327182050.GA1363414@ziepe.ca>
On 3/27/24 11:20 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 06:09:37PM +0000, Joao Martins wrote:
>> On 27/03/2024 17:49, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>>> On 3/27/24 7:59 PM, Joao Martins wrote:
>>>> On 27/03/2024 11:49, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 03:14:25PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/26/24 8:03 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 06:09:34PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>>>>>>>> Even after applying this config patch and following snippet (which doesn't
>>>>>>>> terminate the program if mmap doesn't allocate exactly as the hint), I'm
>>>>>>>> finding failed tests.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @@ -1746,7 +1748,7 @@ FIXTURE_SETUP(iommufd_dirty_tracking)
>>>>>>>> assert((uintptr_t)self->buffer % HUGEPAGE_SIZE == 0);
>>>>>>>> vrc = mmap(self->buffer, variant->buffer_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
>>>>>>>> mmap_flags, -1, 0);
>>>>>>>> - assert(vrc == self->buffer);
>>>>>>>> + assert(vrc == self->buffer);// ???
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On x86:
>>>>>>>> # Totals: pass:176 fail:4 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>>>>>>>> On ARM64:
>>>>>>>> # Totals: pass:166 fail:14 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The log files are attached.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You probably don't have enough transparent huge pages available to the process
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> echo 1024 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
>>>>>> After making huge pages available, the iommufd test always passed on x86.
>>>>>> But there are still failures on arm64. I'm looking into the failures.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh that is really strange. Joao? Nicolin?
>>>>>
>>>> Definitely strange, I'll have a look.
>>>>
>>>> So it set the expected number of dirty bits as that assert doesn't fail, but it
>>>> is failing when we check that even bits are set but not odd ones. Like it's
>>>> hasn't set those bits.
>>>>
>>>> For mock tests there should be no difference between x86 and ARM assuming the
>>>> typical 4K page-size. Maybe this is 64k base pages in ARM? That's the only thing
>>>> that I can think of that affected mock domain.
>>> The config is attached. The defaults are being used i.e., 4k page.
>>
>> Looks like CONFIG_IOMMUFD_DRIVER is not defined :(
>>
>> Thus no bits are being set.
>
> Oh!
>
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/Kconfig
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ config IOMMUFD_TEST
> depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
> depends on FAULT_INJECTION
> depends on RUNTIME_TESTING_MENU
> + select IOMMUFD_DRIVER
> default n
> help
> This is dangerous, do not enable unless running
>
Tested this patch on my system and it fixes all issues for ARM64. Please
add tag for this Kconfig patch:
Tested by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Also please accept the patch in this current series.
>
> ???
>
> Jason
--
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-27 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-25 9:00 [PATCH] selftests: iommu: add config needed for iommufd_fail_nth Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-03-25 9:11 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-04-05 0:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-14 14:39 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-04-15 16:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-26 13:09 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-03-26 15:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-27 10:14 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-03-27 11:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-27 14:59 ` Joao Martins
2024-03-27 17:49 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-03-27 18:09 ` Joao Martins
2024-03-27 18:17 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-03-27 18:33 ` Joao Martins
2024-03-27 18:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-27 18:34 ` Joao Martins
2024-03-27 20:13 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum [this message]
2024-04-04 11:48 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ccab9229-c0de-4c38-bb5c-7f32cbd7fa2b@collabora.com \
--to=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox