Re: Kernel SCM saga..

Marcin Dalecki
2005-04-09T01:22:40Z

On 2005-04-09, at 03:09, Chris Wedgwood wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 03:00:44AM +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
>
>> Yes it sucks less for this purpose. See subversion as reference.
>
> Whatever solution people come up with, ideally it should be tolerant
> to minor amounts of corruption (so I can recover the rest of my data
> if need be) and it should also have decent sanity checks to find
> corruption as soon as reasonable possible.

Yes this is the reason subversion is moving toward an alternative
back-end
based on a custom DB mapped closely to the file system.