From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
To: "Harry Yoo (Oracle)" <harry@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>, Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Shengming Hu <hu.shengming@zte.com.cn>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH slab/for-next v4 6/8] mm/slab: introduce struct kvfree_rcu_head for kvfree_rcu batching
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:06:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd11b015-7c59-4ce4-8eb0-8040fbb2cdfc@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720-kfree_rcu_nolock-v4-6-964e03c41a4e@kernel.org>
On 7/20/26 14:44, Harry Yoo (Oracle) wrote:
> rcu_head is overkill for kvfree_rcu() because the callback
> function is always either kfree(), vfree(), or free_large_kmalloc(),
> and thus there is no need for a function pointer.
>
> kvfree_rcu batching reuses the field to store the start address
> of an object, however, this is not strictly needed because we can
> calculate the start address in the slowpath. For the purpose of
> kvfree_rcu batching, it is sufficient to implement a linked list using
> a single pointer.
>
> Introduce a new struct called kvfree_rcu_head (the name was suggested
> by Vlastimil Babka), which is similar to rcu_head but is only a single
> pointer to build a linked list, without a function pointer, when
> CONFIG_KVFREE_RCU_BATCHED=y.
>
> When kvfree_rcu is not batched, kvfree_rcu_head is the same size
> as rcu_head. Note that shrinking struct kvfree_rcu_head on
> CONFIG_KVFREE_RCU_BATCHED=n kernels would inevitably require additional
> complexity and also some sort of batching (which defeats the purpose of
> the config option) because it cannot fall back to call_rcu().
>
> For now there are no user-visible changes to the API. k[v]free_rcu()
> simply casts rcu_head to kvfree_rcu_head. While this does not affect
> the API, it allows kfree_rcu_nolock() to reuse kvfree_rcu batching
> as a fallback when trylock or sheaf allocation fails.
>
> Stop storing the object pointer in rcu_head.func and instead calculate
> the object's start address in kvfree_rcu_list(). Factor out the existing
> logic to calculate the start address from kvfree_rcu_cb() to
> kvmalloc_obj_start_addr().
>
> Signed-off-by: Harry Yoo (Oracle) <harry@kernel.org>
Nice.
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
Nit:
> --- a/mm/slab.h
> +++ b/mm/slab.h
> @@ -351,6 +351,33 @@ static inline int objs_per_slab(const struct kmem_cache *cache,
> return slab->objects;
> }
>
> +/* kvfree_rcu_head offset can be only less than page size */
> +static inline void *kvmalloc_obj_start_addr(void *head)
> +{
> + void *obj = head;
> +
> + if (unlikely(is_vmalloc_addr(obj))) {
> + obj = (void *) PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN((unsigned long)obj);
> + } else {
> + struct page *page = virt_to_page(obj);
> + struct slab *slab = page_slab(page);
Can use virt_to_slab().
> +
> + if (!slab) {
> + obj = (void *) PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN((unsigned long)obj);
> + } else if (is_kfence_address(obj)) {
> + obj = kfence_object_start(obj);
> + } else {
> + struct kmem_cache *s = slab->slab_cache;
> + unsigned int idx = __obj_to_index(s, slab_address(slab), obj);
> +
> + obj = slab_address(slab) + s->size * idx;
> + obj = fixup_red_left(s, obj);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return obj;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * State of the slab allocator.
> *
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-21 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 12:44 [PATCH slab/for-next v4 0/8] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() and improve slub_kunit coverage Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 1/8] mm/slab, slub_kunit: register kprobe to trigger _nolock APIs Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 12:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 3:27 ` hu.shengming
2026-07-22 7:16 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-22 8:32 ` hu.shengming
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 2/8] mm/slab: handle the !allow_spin case in kfree_rcu_sheaf() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 13:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 10:07 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-22 7:28 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-22 7:37 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-22 7:39 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 3/8] mm/slab: use call_rcu() in unknown context if irqs are enabled Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 13:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 4/8] mm/slab: extend deferred free mechanism to handle rcu sheaves Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 13:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 5/8] mm/slab: allow kfree_rcu_sheaf() on PREEMPT_RT Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 12:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 10:46 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-22 7:41 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 6/8] mm/slab: introduce struct kvfree_rcu_head for kvfree_rcu batching Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 13:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 11:06 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) [this message]
2026-07-22 7:42 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 7/8] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 13:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 13:09 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-22 8:15 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-22 10:05 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-22 13:03 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 8/8] slub_kunit: extend the test for kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd11b015-7c59-4ce4-8eb0-8040fbb2cdfc@kernel.org \
--to=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=hu.shengming@zte.com.cn \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox