From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
To: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
ChiaEn Wu <chiaen_wu@richtek.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Cc: dan.carpenter@linaro.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
error27@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: supply: mt6370: Fix missing error code in mt6370_chg_toggle_cfo()
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 12:43:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd6eea67-df0f-08b1-61cd-57a3b4f9cf0d@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230906084815.2827930-1-harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Il 06/09/23 10:48, Harshit Mogalapalli ha scritto:
> When mt6370_chg_field_get() suceeds, ret is set to zero and returning
> zero when flash led is still in strobe mode looks incorrect.
>
> Fixes: 233cb8a47d65 ("power: supply: mt6370: Add MediaTek MT6370 charger driver")
> Signed-off-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
> ---
> This is based on static analysis with smatch, only compile tested.
> ---
> drivers/power/supply/mt6370-charger.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/mt6370-charger.c b/drivers/power/supply/mt6370-charger.c
> index f27dae5043f5..a9641bd3d8cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/mt6370-charger.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/mt6370-charger.c
> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int mt6370_chg_toggle_cfo(struct mt6370_priv *priv)
>
> if (fl_strobe) {
> dev_err(priv->dev, "Flash led is still in strobe mode\n");
> - return ret;
> + return -EINVAL;
I think that returning 0 here was intentional, but I agree on a return ret
here being both confusing and wrong.
That's how I get this logic:
The function is enabling strobe mode, but if the flash led is *already* in
strobe mode, the function exits cleanly because there's nothing to do, as
the enablement is already done.
Hence.... I believe that the right fix is not to return -EINVAL, but rather
to change that to `return 0` instead.
ChiaEn, can you please confirm, or deny my statement?
Regards,
Angelo
> }
>
> /* cfo off */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-07 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-06 8:48 [PATCH] power: supply: mt6370: Fix missing error code in mt6370_chg_toggle_cfo() Harshit Mogalapalli
2023-09-07 10:43 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno [this message]
2023-09-07 11:08 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-09-08 2:19 ` ChiaEn Wu
2023-09-08 10:01 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-09-11 20:15 ` Sebastian Reichel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd6eea67-df0f-08b1-61cd-57a3b4f9cf0d@collabora.com \
--to=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=chiaen_wu@richtek.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox