Re: [NET] Remove ARM dependency for dm9000 driver

David Woodhouse
2005-12-01T08:36:52Z

On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 19:02 +0000, Russell King wrote:
> We agree to disagree. For example, in all probability, ARM will never
> see a TPM chip, yet it's offered for selection. Given that, does it
> really make sense to offer it for ARM?

You speak of _probability_. Yes, it makes sense to offer it as an
_option_ for ARM. It just doesn't make sense to put it in the defconfig
for any of the existing platforms.

Nobody expects 'allyesconfig' to be something you'd actually want to
_use_.

--
dwmw2