From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: 黄少波 <huangshaobo3@xiaomi.com>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
"Kevin Tian" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
李高鹏 <chenwei29@xiaomi.com>, 梁伟鹏 <weipengliang@xiaomi.com>,
翁金飞 <wengjinfei@xiaomi.com>, 熊亮 <xiongliang@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH] pci/msi: remove redundant calculation in msi_setup_msi_desc
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 11:30:54 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cdbbe32-e255-8a94-5bd-412ecddf4b1d@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ebf5d8032ad418da4f24516cd23406e@xiaomi.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1202 bytes --]
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023, 黄少波 wrote:
You should add () to the function name in the subject and use capital
PCI/MSI.
> Whether to support 64-bit address status has been calculated before,
> and the calculation result can be used directly afterwards, so use
> msi_attrib.is_64 to avoid double calculation.
>
> Suggested-by: weipengliang <weipengliang@xiaomi.com>
> Signed-off-by: sparkhuang <huangshaobo3@xiaomi.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/msi/msi.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
> index ef1d885..304e889 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
> @@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ static int msi_setup_msi_desc(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec,
> desc.pci.msi_attrib.multiple = ilog2(__roundup_pow_of_two(nvec));
> desc.affinity = masks;
>
> - if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT)
> + if (desc.pci.msi_attrib.is_64)
> desc.pci.mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_64;
> else
> desc.pci.mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_32;
> --
> 2.7.4
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-18 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-18 7:26 Subject: [PATCH] pci/msi: remove redundant calculation in msi_setup_msi_desc 黄少波
2023-08-18 8:30 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2023-08-23 14:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-24 7:27 ` huangshaobo3
2023-08-24 9:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-24 10:52 ` sparkhuang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cdbbe32-e255-8a94-5bd-412ecddf4b1d@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=chenwei29@xiaomi.com \
--cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=huangshaobo3@xiaomi.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=weipengliang@xiaomi.com \
--cc=wengjinfei@xiaomi.com \
--cc=xiongliang@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox