From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>, vkoul@kernel.org
Cc: yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@intel.com,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] soundwire: cadence: Remove wasted space in response_buf
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 12:12:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cdc6b2ea-d20d-0e2e-0791-faf8f0994c78@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221201134845.4055907-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
On 12/1/22 07:48, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> The response_buf was declared much larger (128 entries) than the number
> of responses that could ever be written into it (maximum 8).
Indeed I don't know why we used 128 entries. This is a magic value that
doesn't appear in any specs I've looked at.
Note that there's 'sniffer' mode when each response takes two
consecutive 32-words in the FIFO. we've never used this mode though so
it's not really an issue.
It's also possible that this is related to the automatic command retry,
where a failed command can be re-issued 15 times. However in that case
the worst case would be 32 commands * 15 = 480. The value of 128 makes
no sense at all, unless it was an upper bound for 8 * 15. We don't use
this hardware retry btw.
See more below...
> Reduce response_buf to 8 entries and add checking in cdns_read_response()
> to prevent overflowing reponse_buf if CDNS_MCP_RX_FIFO_AVAIL contains
> an unexpectedly large number.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
> ---
> drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c b/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c
> index 27699f341f2c..95c84d9f0775 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c
> @@ -774,8 +774,14 @@ static void cdns_read_response(struct sdw_cdns *cdns)
> u32 num_resp, cmd_base;
> int i;
>
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(cdns->response_buf) < CDNS_MCP_CMD_LEN);
> +
> num_resp = cdns_readl(cdns, CDNS_MCP_FIFOSTAT);
> num_resp &= CDNS_MCP_RX_FIFO_AVAIL;
> + if (num_resp > ARRAY_SIZE(cdns->response_buf)) {
> + dev_warn(cdns->dev, "RX AVAIL %d too long\n", num_resp);
> + num_resp = CDNS_MCP_CMD_LEN;
.... this is different from what the hardware documentation tells me.
The range of values to RX_FIFO_AVAIL is 0..RX_FIFO_DEPTH + 2.
I don't understand the +2, but we should maybe be more cautious and use
u32 response_buf[CDNS_MCP_CMD_LEN + 2];
> + }
>
> cmd_base = CDNS_MCP_CMD_BASE;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.h b/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.h
> index 0434d70d4b1f..c2d817e8e22a 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.h
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.h
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ struct sdw_cdns {
> struct sdw_bus bus;
> unsigned int instance;
>
> - u32 response_buf[0x80];
> + u32 response_buf[8];
> struct completion tx_complete;
> struct sdw_defer *defer;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-01 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-01 13:48 [PATCH 0/3] soundwire: cadence: Fix oversized FIFO size define Richard Fitzgerald
2022-12-01 13:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] soundwire: cadence: Don't overflow the command FIFOs Richard Fitzgerald
2022-12-01 17:49 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-12-01 13:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] soundwire: cadence: Remove wasted space in response_buf Richard Fitzgerald
2022-12-01 18:12 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2022-12-02 10:19 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2022-12-01 13:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] soundwire: cadence: Drain the RX FIFO after an IO timeout Richard Fitzgerald
2022-12-01 18:20 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cdc6b2ea-d20d-0e2e-0791-faf8f0994c78@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox