Re: [PATCH] Delete cryptoloop

Paul Jackson
2004-07-24T19:54:30Z

Andrew suggested:
> printk("cryptoloop will be ... June 30, 2005 ...

Andreas asked:
> If EXPERIMENTAL isn't discuraging enough why not use BROKEN?

Won't printk's will reach a wider proportion of the intended audience
than CONFIG variations?

And the specificity of the date-certain in the printk enables individual
planning and adaptive behaviour that the timelessness of CONFIG labels
can't touch.

Does your printk idea work for devfs as well, Andrew?

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373