public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, daniel.thompson@linaro.org,
	joel@joelfernandes.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	christoffer.dall@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 15/26] arm64: alternative: Apply alternatives early in boot process
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 14:51:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cec17e88-d199-abb4-4919-deff7182a26f@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1546956464-48825-16-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com>

Hi Julien,

On 08/01/2019 14:07, Julien Thierry wrote:
> From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> 
> Currently alternatives are applied very late in the boot process (and
> a long time after we enable scheduling). Some alternative sequences,
> such as those that alter the way CPU context is stored, must be applied
> much earlier in the boot sequence.
> 
> Introduce apply_boot_alternatives() to allow some alternatives to be
> applied immediately after we detect the CPU features of the boot CPU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> [julien.thierry@arm.com: rename to fit new cpufeature framework better,
> 			 apply BOOT_SCOPE feature early in boot]
> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative.h |  1 +
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h  |  4 ++++
>   arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c      | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c       |  6 +++++
>   arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c              |  7 ++++++
>   5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative.h
> index 9806a23..b9f8d78 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ struct alt_instr {
>   typedef void (*alternative_cb_t)(struct alt_instr *alt,
>   				 __le32 *origptr, __le32 *updptr, int nr_inst);
>   
> +void __init apply_boot_alternatives(void);
>   void __init apply_alternatives_all(void);
>   bool alternative_is_applied(u16 cpufeature);
>   
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 89c3f31..e505e1f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -391,6 +391,10 @@ static inline int cpucap_default_scope(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap)
>   extern struct static_key_false cpu_hwcap_keys[ARM64_NCAPS];
>   extern struct static_key_false arm64_const_caps_ready;
>   
> +/* ARM64 CAPS + alternative_cb */
> +#define ARM64_NPATCHABLE (ARM64_NCAPS + 1)
> +extern DECLARE_BITMAP(boot_capabilities, ARM64_NPATCHABLE);
> +
>   #define for_each_available_cap(cap)		\
>   	for_each_set_bit(cap, cpu_hwcaps, ARM64_NCAPS)
>   
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
> index c947d22..a9b4677 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
> @@ -155,7 +155,8 @@ static void clean_dcache_range_nopatch(u64 start, u64 end)
>   	} while (cur += d_size, cur < end);
>   }
>   
> -static void __apply_alternatives(void *alt_region, bool is_module)
> +static void __apply_alternatives(void *alt_region,  bool is_module,
> +				 unsigned long *feature_mask)
>   {
>   	struct alt_instr *alt;
>   	struct alt_region *region = alt_region;
> @@ -165,6 +166,9 @@ static void __apply_alternatives(void *alt_region, bool is_module)
>   	for (alt = region->begin; alt < region->end; alt++) {
>   		int nr_inst;
>   
> +		if (!test_bit(alt->cpufeature, feature_mask))
> +			continue;
> +
>   		/* Use ARM64_CB_PATCH as an unconditional patch */
>   		if (alt->cpufeature < ARM64_CB_PATCH &&
>   		    !cpus_have_cap(alt->cpufeature))
> @@ -203,8 +207,11 @@ static void __apply_alternatives(void *alt_region, bool is_module)
>   		__flush_icache_all();
>   		isb();
>   
> -		/* We applied all that was available */
> -		bitmap_copy(applied_alternatives, cpu_hwcaps, ARM64_NCAPS);
> +		/* Ignore ARM64_CB bit from feature mask */
> +		bitmap_or(applied_alternatives, applied_alternatives,
> +			  feature_mask, ARM64_NCAPS);
> +		bitmap_and(applied_alternatives, applied_alternatives,
> +			   cpu_hwcaps, ARM64_NCAPS);
>   	}
>   }
>   
> @@ -225,8 +232,13 @@ static int __apply_alternatives_multi_stop(void *unused)
>   			cpu_relax();
>   		isb();
>   	} else {
> +		DECLARE_BITMAP(remaining_capabilities, ARM64_NPATCHABLE);
> +
> +		bitmap_complement(remaining_capabilities, boot_capabilities,
> +				  ARM64_NPATCHABLE);
> +
>   		BUG_ON(all_alternatives_applied);
> -		__apply_alternatives(&region, false);
> +		__apply_alternatives(&region, false, remaining_capabilities);
>   		/* Barriers provided by the cache flushing */
>   		WRITE_ONCE(all_alternatives_applied, 1);
>   	}
> @@ -240,6 +252,24 @@ void __init apply_alternatives_all(void)
>   	stop_machine(__apply_alternatives_multi_stop, NULL, cpu_online_mask);
>   }
>   
> +/*
> + * This is called very early in the boot process (directly after we run
> + * a feature detect on the boot CPU). No need to worry about other CPUs
> + * here.
> + */
> +void __init apply_boot_alternatives(void)
> +{
> +	struct alt_region region = {
> +		.begin	= (struct alt_instr *)__alt_instructions,
> +		.end	= (struct alt_instr *)__alt_instructions_end,
> +	};
> +
> +	/* If called on non-boot cpu things could go wrong */
> +	WARN_ON(smp_processor_id() != 0);
> +
> +	__apply_alternatives(&region, false, &boot_capabilities[0]);
> +}
> +
>   #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
>   void apply_alternatives_module(void *start, size_t length)
>   {
> @@ -247,7 +277,10 @@ void apply_alternatives_module(void *start, size_t length)
>   		.begin	= start,
>   		.end	= start + length,
>   	};
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(all_capabilities, ARM64_NPATCHABLE);
> +
> +	bitmap_fill(all_capabilities, ARM64_NPATCHABLE);
>   
> -	__apply_alternatives(&region, true);
> +	__apply_alternatives(&region, true, &all_capabilities[0]);
>   }
>   #endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 84fa5be..71c8d4f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,9 @@
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_hwcaps);
>   static struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const __ro_after_init *cpu_hwcaps_ptrs[ARM64_NCAPS];
>   
> +/* Need also bit for ARM64_CB_PATCH */
> +DECLARE_BITMAP(boot_capabilities, ARM64_NPATCHABLE);
> +
>   /*
>    * Flag to indicate if we have computed the system wide
>    * capabilities based on the boot time active CPUs. This
> @@ -1672,6 +1675,9 @@ static void update_cpu_capabilities(u16 scope_mask)
>   		if (caps->desc)
>   			pr_info("detected: %s\n", caps->desc);
>   		cpus_set_cap(caps->capability);
> +
> +		if (caps->type & SCOPE_BOOT_CPU)

You may want to do :
		if (scope_mask & SCOPE_BOOT_CPU)

for a tighter check to ensure this doesn't update the boot_capabilities
after we have applied the boot_scope alternatives and miss applying the
alternatives for those, should someone add a multi-scope (i.e SCOPE_BOOT_CPU and
something else) capability (even by mistake).

With that:

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-08 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-08 14:07 [PATCH v8 00/26] arm64: provide pseudo NMI with GICv3 Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 01/26] arm64: Fix HCR.TGE status for NMI contexts Julien Thierry
2019-01-14 15:56   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-01-14 16:12     ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-14 17:25       ` James Morse
2019-01-28  9:16   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 02/26] arm64: Remove unused daif related functions/macros Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 03/26] arm64: cpufeature: Set SYSREG_GIC_CPUIF as a boot system feature Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 04/26] arm64: cpufeature: Add cpufeature for IRQ priority masking Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 05/26] arm/arm64: gic-v3: Add PMR and RPR accessors Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 06/26] irqchip/gic-v3: Switch to PMR masking before calling IRQ handler Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 07/26] arm64: ptrace: Provide definitions for PMR values Julien Thierry
2019-01-14 16:12   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 08/26] arm64: Make PMR part of task context Julien Thierry
2019-01-18 16:10   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 09/26] arm64: Unmask PMR before going idle Julien Thierry
2019-01-18 16:23   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-01-18 17:17     ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 10/26] arm64: kvm: Unmask PMR before entering guest Julien Thierry
2019-01-18 16:25   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 11/26] efi: Let architectures decide the flags that should be saved/restored Julien Thierry
2019-01-18 16:26   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 12/26] arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 15:40   ` Dave Martin
2019-01-08 15:51     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-01-08 16:45       ` Dave Martin
2019-01-08 17:16         ` Marc Zyngier
2019-01-08 18:01           ` Dave Martin
2019-01-08 17:58         ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 18:37           ` Dave Martin
2019-01-18 16:09   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-01-18 16:57     ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-18 17:30       ` Catalin Marinas
2019-01-18 17:33         ` Catalin Marinas
2019-01-21  8:45           ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-18 16:35   ` Dave Martin
2019-01-18 17:27     ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-18 18:23       ` Dave Martin
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 13/26] arm64: daifflags: Include PMR in daifflags restore operations Julien Thierry
2019-01-18 16:43   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 14/26] arm64: alternative: Allow alternative status checking per cpufeature Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 15/26] arm64: alternative: Apply alternatives early in boot process Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:51   ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2019-01-08 15:20     ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 17:40       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-01-10 10:50         ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 16/26] irqchip/gic-v3: Factor group0 detection into functions Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 17/26] arm64: Switch to PMR masking when starting CPUs Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 18/26] arm64: gic-v3: Implement arch support for priority masking Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 19/26] irqchip/gic-v3: Detect if GIC can support pseudo-NMIs Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 20/26] irqchip/gic-v3: Handle pseudo-NMIs Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 21/26] irqchip/gic: Add functions to access irq priorities Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 22/26] irqchip/gic-v3: Allow interrupts to be set as pseudo-NMI Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 23/26] arm64: Handle serror in NMI context Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 24/26] arm64: Skip preemption when exiting an NMI Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 25/26] arm64: Skip irqflags tracing for NMI in IRQs disabled context Julien Thierry
2019-01-08 14:07 ` [PATCH v8 26/26] arm64: Enable the support of pseudo-NMIs Julien Thierry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cec17e88-d199-abb4-4919-deff7182a26f@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox