From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.9-rc1
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:27:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cgisaa$2mt$1@gatekeeper.tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B2093FFC31B7A45862B62A376EA7176033C058D@mickey.topnz.ac.nz>
Sartorelli, Kevin wrote:
> Daniel Andersen wrote:
>
>>As Linus initially said, there is the possibility of releasing
>>a bug-fix patch 2.6.8.2 *after* 2.6.9 has been released.
>
>
> So, in this case, which would be considered the latest stable kernel to be used in production? I can see this getting to a stage where you just pick and hope :-(
Do you have some other way to get a kernel now? Do you go to a new
kernel right after it's released? Not to mention the question of which
patches do you apply as they come out? I like np, but I have used ck and
mm (and heavily used aa and ac when they were available).
--
-bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-25 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-25 0:31 Linux 2.6.9-rc1 Sartorelli, Kevin
2004-08-25 1:05 ` Daniel Andersen
2004-08-25 1:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-25 14:52 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-25 21:14 ` Roman Zippel
2004-08-26 8:09 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-08-26 8:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-08-27 12:45 ` Horst von Brand
2004-08-27 21:30 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-08-25 20:27 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-25 22:20 David Mansfield
2004-08-24 7:49 Linus Torvalds
2004-08-24 16:41 ` Pierre Ossman
2004-08-24 16:46 ` Russell King
2004-08-24 16:59 ` Pierre Ossman
2004-08-24 17:50 ` Alexander Gran
2004-08-24 18:42 ` Matt Mackall
2004-08-24 19:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-24 19:38 ` Chris Meadors
2004-08-24 19:54 ` Florian Weimer
2004-08-24 20:13 ` Josh Boyer
2004-08-24 20:25 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-08-24 20:07 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-08-24 20:32 ` Matt Mackall
2004-08-24 21:22 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-24 22:55 ` Dave Hansen
2004-08-24 22:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-08-24 23:46 ` Dâniel Fraga
2004-08-25 0:11 ` Daniel Andersen
2004-08-25 1:01 ` Dâniel Fraga
2004-08-25 4:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-08-25 20:36 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-08-25 0:25 ` Stephen Wille Padnos
2004-08-25 1:11 ` Dâniel Fraga
2004-08-25 9:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-08-25 20:18 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-08-24 18:54 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-08-24 21:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-08-24 21:58 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-08-25 14:45 ` Chris Friesen
2004-08-25 16:12 ` Matthias Andree
2004-08-25 18:52 ` Joshua Kwan
2004-08-25 20:32 ` Harald Welte
2004-08-25 21:35 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-08-25 23:48 ` Harald Welte
2004-08-25 23:44 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-26 3:14 ` Joshua Kwan
2004-08-26 8:02 ` Harald Welte
2004-08-26 5:07 ` Mark Lord
[not found] ` <20040825231407.058b3ea6.davem@redhat.com>
2004-08-26 6:15 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='cgisaa$2mt$1@gatekeeper.tmr.com' \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox