From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268679AbUH3Rb4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:31:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268646AbUH3Rb4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:31:56 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:23969 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268582AbUH3R2g (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:28:36 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marc_Str=E4mke?= Subject: Re: Problem accessing Sandisk CompactFlash Cards (Connected to the IDE bus) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:31:12 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4131DC5D.8060408@redhat.com> <41326FE1.2050508@redhat.com> <20040830010712.GC12313@logos.cnet> <41333879.2040902@redhat.com> <41335F8B.3000207@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p508ea078.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413 Debian/1.6-5 X-Accept-Language: en In-Reply-To: <41335F8B.3000207@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Neil Horman wrote: > > 1) older SanDisk cards are detected as CFA devices and are working, but > not bootable. > > 2) newer SanDisk cards are detected as ATA disks, and are bootable as > such, but do not seem to be operating correctly (the aforementioned ide > errors). > > > Is this correct? Not fully, actually both are bootable, but the second one gets read/write errors after booting, and when accessed after booting from another boot device (NFS) for the other points, actually both cards are used in the same adapter hardware. I can switch both cards in ONE system, and the error only appears with the newer card. I found some other subtlety, in the dmesg of the nonworking card there is a message: hdb: C/H/S=0/0/0 from BIOS ignored which doesnt appear with the working card, so the card is already treated differently by the bios, or the different information from the bios somehow interfers with hardware probing? (just speculating on this point) I will do some more tests and tell you what i find out.