[PATCH] removes unnessary print of space

[PATCH] removes unnessary print of space

[Kirill Korotaev]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 149 bytes --]

This patch removes unnessary print of space in bust_spinlocks().
printk("") wakeups klogd as well, no need to print a space
and make a mess.

Kirill

[-- Attachment #2: diff-oops-printk --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 365 bytes --]

--- ./arch/i386/mm/fault.c.printk	2004-08-14 14:54:46.000000000 +0400
+++ ./arch/i386/mm/fault.c	2004-09-06 11:02:32.730550352 +0400
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ void bust_spinlocks(int yes)
 	 * a poke.  Hold onto your hats...
 	 */
 	console_loglevel = 15;		/* NMI oopser may have shut the console up */
-	printk(" ");
+	printk("");
 	console_loglevel = loglevel_save;
 }
 

Re: [PATCH] removes unnessary print of space

[Andrew Morton]

Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru> wrote:
>
> This patch removes unnessary print of space in bust_spinlocks().
>  printk("") wakeups klogd as well,

Until some smarty comes along and optimises printk() to skip empty strings.

An explicit wake_up_klogd() thing might make sense, rather than relying
upon side-effects.

> no need to print a space and make a mess.

Can't say that I've ever noticed that space.

Re: [PATCH] removes unnessary print of space

[Kirill Korotaev]

>>This patch removes unnessary print of space in bust_spinlocks().
>> printk("") wakeups klogd as well,
> 
> Until some smarty comes along and optimises printk() to skip empty strings.
> 
> An explicit wake_up_klogd() thing might make sense, rather than relying
> upon side-effects.
yup, you are right. I was the easiest, but not the best.
I'll make a patch with wakeup_klogd.

>>no need to print a space and make a mess.
> Can't say that I've ever noticed that space.
We did. Many times.

I've noticed another thing. There is a default bust_spinlocks() in 
lib/bust_spinlocks.c. 4 architectures including x86 have their own 
copies of it, which are exactly the same as the default one.

So do we really need lib/bust_spinlocks.c or we can move a signle copy 
of this function to kernel/printk.c?

Kirill

Re: [PATCH] removes unnessary print of space

[Andrew Morton]

Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru> wrote:
>
> I've noticed another thing. There is a default bust_spinlocks() in 
>  lib/bust_spinlocks.c. 4 architectures including x86 have their own 
>  copies of it, which are exactly the same as the default one.
> 
>  So do we really need lib/bust_spinlocks.c or we can move a signle copy 
>  of this function to kernel/printk.c?

I'd leave it as is - nobody's complaining.

In the more modern scheme of things we'd move that file to kernel/ and
require that per-arch Kconfigs define CONFIG_NEED_GENERIC_BUST_SPINLOCKS,
then use that in kernel/Makefile.  But doing that now would be gratuitous
noise, IMO.

Re: [PATCH] removes unnessary print of space

[Randy.Dunlap]

On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 12:34:37 +0400 Kirill Korotaev wrote:

| >>This patch removes unnessary print of space in bust_spinlocks().
| >> printk("") wakeups klogd as well,
| > 
| > Until some smarty comes along and optimises printk() to skip empty strings.
| > 
| > An explicit wake_up_klogd() thing might make sense, rather than relying
| > upon side-effects.
| yup, you are right. I was the easiest, but not the best.
| I'll make a patch with wakeup_klogd.
| 
| >>no need to print a space and make a mess.
| > Can't say that I've ever noticed that space.
| We did. Many times.

Same here.  Thanks for cleaning it up.

| I've noticed another thing. There is a default bust_spinlocks() in 
| lib/bust_spinlocks.c. 4 architectures including x86 have their own 
| copies of it, which are exactly the same as the default one.
| 
| So do we really need lib/bust_spinlocks.c or we can move a signle copy 
| of this function to kernel/printk.c?

--
~Randy

Re: [PATCH] removes unnessary print of space

[Chris Wedgwood]

On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 12:08:26AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Until some smarty comes along and optimises printk() to skip empty
> strings.

define the bahavior to disallow that

> An explicit wake_up_klogd() thing might make sense, rather than
> relying upon side-effects.

what about something like:

#define wake_up_klogd() (printk(NULL))

then?  and have printk short-circuit where required when it gets NULL
but still wake the console up?


  --cw

Re: [PATCH] removes unnessary print of space

[Kalin KOZHUHAROV]

Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> This patch removes unnessary print of space in bust_spinlocks().
> printk("") wakeups klogd as well, no need to print a space
> and make a mess.
> 
I may be just a newbie, but why call prink with no arguments?
Does it do something?

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --- ./arch/i386/mm/fault.c.printk	2004-08-14 14:54:46.000000000 +0400
> +++ ./arch/i386/mm/fault.c	2004-09-06 11:02:32.730550352 +0400
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ void bust_spinlocks(int yes)
>  	 * a poke.  Hold onto your hats...
>  	 */
>  	console_loglevel = 15;		/* NMI oopser may have shut the console up */
> -	printk(" ");
> +	printk("");
>  	console_loglevel = loglevel_save;
>  }
>  

Kalin.
-- 
 || ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ||
(  ) http://ThinRope.net/ (  )
 || ______________________ ||

Re: [PATCH] removes unnessary print of space

[Tonnerre]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 344 bytes --]

Salut,

On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 04:57:55PM +0900, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
> I may be just a newbie, but why call prink with no arguments?
> Does it do something?

Actually, there is an argument: a NULL terminated string of size 0.

It  pokes   the  klogd.   This   can  be  done  much   better  through
wake_up_klogd() though.

			    Tonnerre

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]