From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270090AbUJHSYi (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:24:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270076AbUJHSW7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:22:59 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:40896 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270077AbUJHST4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:19:56 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ian Pilcher Subject: Re: kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:104! Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 13:19:52 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-0-215-208.client.comcast.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ian Pilcher wrote: > I hit this trying to install Fedora Core 3 test 1 or test 2. Anyone > who's interested can see the output at: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127862 > > This is obviously one for Red Hat (although they appear massively > uninterested), but I was just wondering if anyone on this list can point > me towards a good spot to start digging. > To ask the question a different way, what can a user-level program do that will cause queue_work (in kernel/workqueue.c) to be called? Thanks! -- ======================================================================== Ian Pilcher i.pilcher@comcast.net ========================================================================