Re: gcc -O2 vs gcc -Os performance

Roger Larsson
2003-02-06T23:12:15Z

On Thursday 06 February 2003 21:38, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> gcc-3.2
>
> 2901299 vmlinux.O2
> 2667827 vmlinux.Os
>

In an earlier message, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>
> 894822 Feb 5 23:50 /boot/vmlinuz-2.5.59-mjb3-Os
> 906203 Feb 5 22:46 /boot/vmlinuz-2.5.59-mjb3.old

And if you compare both with same/no compression?

/RogerL

--
Roger Larsson
Skellefteå
Sweden