Re: [Lse-tech] gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance

Momchil Velikov
2003-02-10T12:37:07Z

>>>>> "Martin" == Martin J Bligh <mbligh@aracnet.com> writes:

Martin> But the point is still the same ... even if it is doing
Martin> more agressive optimisation, it's not actually buying us
Martin> anything (at least for the kernel)

which might be due in part to ``-fno-strict-aliasing'' used to compile
the Linux kernel.

~velco