Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance

Tomas Szepe
2003-02-05T02:54:34Z

> [lm@bitmover.com]
>
> I can't offer any immediate help with this but I want the same thing. At
> some point, we're planning on funding some extensions into GCC or whatever
> reasonable C compiler is around:
>
> - associative arrays as a builtin type
> - regular expressions
> - tk bindings built in

Is it April 1st already?

I can't see why this should be a language extension other than you want
to make a real mess out of it.

> and then we'll port BK to that compiler. It's likely to be GCC because we
> want to support all the different architectures but if a kernel sponsered
> cc shows up we'll happily throw money at that.

Ever heard of glib?
#include <glib.h> and be done with it.

--
Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>