Re: [PATCH 00/10] CPUFreq: Fixes & Cleanups for 3.12

Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03T21:52:04Z

On Saturday, August 03, 2013 06:58:35 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 3 August 2013 17:37, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Saturday, August 03, 2013 05:19:18 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> Hi Rafael,
> >>
> >> This patchset tries to fix & cleanup many existing cpufreq core issues. First
> >> four patches tries to cleanup basic problems in cpufreq core. Its first patch
> >> was earlier sent separately but now is part of this series.
> >>
> >> Fifth patch was also sent earlier as reply to your patches and was reviewed by
> >> Srivatsa. Sixth patch was picked from Lukasz's patchset on introducing software
> >> "boost" feature in core. It will be used by this patchset.
> >>
> >> And last four are the most significant part of this set. They try to make many
> >> things simple and robust.
> >>
> >> This is rebased of your bleeding-edge branch + two patches from you:
> >> 18a6b03 cpufreq: Avoid double kobject_put() for the same kobject in error code path
> >> d0cde63 cpufreq: Do not hold driver module references for additional policy CPUs
> >> abe513f Merge branch 'acpi-sleep-next' into linux-next
> >>
> >> They are also pushed in my cpufreq-next branch
> >
> > How much testing has that received so far?
>
> I planned to add this information but forgot at the last moment. It
> was partially
> tested. As it was mostly developed over the weekend I wasn't able to do much
> of testing. I posted it to get early comments, and testing would complete by
> beginning of next week.

OK, thanks!