From: "Opensource [Steve Twiss]" <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Dajun Chen <david.chen@diasemi.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
RTC linux <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [RESEND] [PATCH V1 0/2] da9063: Support for RTC and register definition updates
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 13:22:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1399465372.git.stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com> (raw)
From: Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
This patch series updates the register definitions for the DA9063 PMIC
and adds support for the DA9063 RTC.
- PATCH-0001 Changes to the DA9063 registers.h to support production silicon;
- PATCH-0002 Add a new RTC driver which is applicable to this version of the silicon;
This is a resend of the original patch set, now adding Andrew Morton after
the RTC driver PATCH-0002 has been waiting to be merged since March.
Would it be possible to merge PATCH-0002 into linux-next please?
This patch has already been Acked by Alessandro Zummo but has not been able
to be applied: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/26/56
- PATCH-0001 Please note that Lee Jones has already applied the registers.h
patch into the linux-next tree. See here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/10/267
- PATCH-0002 The RTC component of the patch set was originally Acked here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/7/112 but has not yet been merged.
Thank you,
Steve Twiss, Dialog Semiconductor Ltd.
S Twiss (2):
mfd: da9063: Upgrade of register definitions to support production
silicon
rtc: da9063: RTC driver
drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 10 +
drivers/rtc/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c | 332 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/mfd/da9063/registers.h | 120 ++++++------
4 files changed, 405 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c
--
end-of-patch for PATCH V1
next reply other threads:[~2014-05-07 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-07 12:22 Opensource [Steve Twiss] [this message]
2014-05-07 12:22 ` [RESEND] [PATCH V1 1/2] mfd: da9063: Upgrade of register definitions to support production silicon Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2014-05-08 8:00 ` Lee Jones
2014-05-07 12:22 ` [RESEND] [PATCH V1 2/2] rtc: da9063: RTC driver Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2014-05-07 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2014-05-08 14:25 ` Opensource [Steve Twiss]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1399465372.git.stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com \
--to=stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@linaro.org \
--cc=david.chen@diasemi.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox