Re: [RFC PATCH 07/17] block: replace sg_iovec with iov_iter

Dongsu Park
2014-12-23T12:18:21Z

On 23.12.2014 02:44, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Does this and the next three patches really depend on the earlier ones?
> Unless I'm missing something they are cleanups on their own.
>
> It might make sense to get all these cleanups out as a preparatory
> series first.

I think so too. Patches #07-10 can be split into a separate patchset.
I guess they are included just because Kent tried to follow up
suggestions in the previous discussion.
I don't care about either way. So I'll split them up.

Thanks,
Dongsu