From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] btrfs: ENOMEM bugfixes
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 02:51:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1424168589.git.osandov@osandov.com> (raw)
Hi,
As it turns out, running with low memory is a really easy way to shake
out undesirable behavior in Btrfs. This can be especially bad when
considering that a memory limit is really easy to hit in a container
(e.g., by using cgroup memory.limit_in_bytes). Here's a simple script
that can hit several problems:
----
#!/bin/sh
cgcreate -g memory:enomem
MEM=$((64 * 1024 * 1024))
echo $MEM > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/enomem/memory.limit_in_bytes
cgexec -g memory:enomem ~/xfstests/ltp/fsstress -p128 -n999999999 -d /mnt/test &
trap "killall fsstress; exit 0" SIGINT SIGTERM
while true; do
cgexec -g memory:enomem python -c '
l = []
while True:
l.append(0)'
done
----
Ignoring for now the cases that drop the filesystem into read-only mode
with relatively little fuss, here are a few patches that fix some of the
low-hanging fruit. They apply to Linus' tree as of today.
Thanks!
Omar Sandoval (3):
btrfs: handle ENOMEM in btrfs_alloc_tree_block
btrfs: handle race on ENOMEM in alloc_extent_buffer
btrfs: check io_ctl_prepare_pages return in __btrfs_write_out_cache
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c | 10 ++++++----
3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--
2.3.0
next reply other threads:[~2015-02-17 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-17 10:51 Omar Sandoval [this message]
2015-02-17 10:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: handle ENOMEM in btrfs_alloc_tree_block Omar Sandoval
2015-02-17 10:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: handle race on ENOMEM in alloc_extent_buffer Omar Sandoval
2015-02-17 18:44 ` Omar Sandoval
2015-02-17 10:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: check io_ctl_prepare_pages return in __btrfs_write_out_cache Omar Sandoval
2015-02-22 14:58 ` Liu Bo
2015-02-20 21:20 ` [PATCH 0/3] btrfs: ENOMEM bugfixes Omar Sandoval
2015-02-20 21:22 ` Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1424168589.git.osandov@osandov.com \
--to=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox