public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 0/2] CR4 fixes (one is urgent)
@ 2016-09-29 19:48 Andy Lutomirski
  2016-09-29 19:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/boot: Fix another __read_cr4() case on 486 Andy Lutomirski
  2016-09-29 19:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/asm: Get rid of __read_cr4_safe() Andy Lutomirski
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andy Lutomirski @ 2016-09-29 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: x86; +Cc: david, Borislav Petkov, Brian Gerst, linux-kernel,
	Andy Lutomirski

Hi Ingo, etc:

Patch 1 fixes a boot regressions that's new in 4.8.

Patch 2 cleans the whole mess up.  It's probably not 4.8 material,
but I'm sending it as part of this series for ease of review.  If
you like, you could apply patch 1 to x86/urgent, merge into x86/asm,
and apply patch 3 on top.

Changes from v1:
 - Drop the patch that was already applied.
 - Get rid of pointless CPUID check, which simplifies it a bit (Borislav)

Andy Lutomirski (2):
  x86/boot: Fix another __read_cr4() case on 486
  x86/asm: Get rid of __read_cr4_safe()

 arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h       |  4 ----
 arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h |  1 -
 arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h  | 22 +++++++---------------
 arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h       |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c            |  1 -
 arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c          |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/setup.c               |  4 +---
 arch/x86/power/cpu.c                  |  2 +-
 arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c              |  1 -
 9 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/boot: Fix another __read_cr4() case on 486
  2016-09-29 19:48 [PATCH v2 0/2] CR4 fixes (one is urgent) Andy Lutomirski
@ 2016-09-29 19:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
  2016-09-29 22:38   ` Borislav Petkov
  2016-09-30 10:43   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
  2016-09-29 19:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/asm: Get rid of __read_cr4_safe() Andy Lutomirski
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andy Lutomirski @ 2016-09-29 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: x86; +Cc: david, Borislav Petkov, Brian Gerst, linux-kernel,
	Andy Lutomirski

The condition for reading CR4 was wrong: there are some CPUs with
CPUID but not CR4.  Rather than trying to make the condition exact,
using __read_cr4_safe().

Reported-by: david@saggiorato.net
Fixes: 18bc7bd523e0 ("x86/boot: Synchronize trampoline_cr4_features and mmu_cr4_features directly")
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 0fa60f5f5a16..98c9cd6f3b5d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -1137,9 +1137,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	 * auditing all the early-boot CR4 manipulation would be needed to
 	 * rule it out.
 	 */
-	if (boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level >= 0)
-		/* A CPU has %cr4 if and only if it has CPUID. */
-		mmu_cr4_features = __read_cr4();
+	mmu_cr4_features = __read_cr4_safe();
 
 	memblock_set_current_limit(get_max_mapped());
 
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/asm: Get rid of __read_cr4_safe()
  2016-09-29 19:48 [PATCH v2 0/2] CR4 fixes (one is urgent) Andy Lutomirski
  2016-09-29 19:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/boot: Fix another __read_cr4() case on 486 Andy Lutomirski
@ 2016-09-29 19:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
  2016-09-30 10:45   ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andy Lutomirski @ 2016-09-29 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: x86; +Cc: david, Borislav Petkov, Brian Gerst, linux-kernel,
	Andy Lutomirski

We use __read_cr4() vs __read_cr4_safe() inconsistently.  On
CR4-less CPUs, all CR4 bits are effectively clear, so we can make
the code simpler and more robust by making __read_cr4() always fix
up faults on 32-bit kernels.

This may fix some bugs on old 486-like CPUs, but I don't have any
easy way to test that.

Cc: david@saggiorato.net
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h       |  4 ----
 arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h |  1 -
 arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h  | 22 +++++++---------------
 arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h       |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c            |  1 -
 arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c          |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/setup.c               |  2 +-
 arch/x86/power/cpu.c                  |  2 +-
 arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c              |  1 -
 9 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
index 2970d22d7766..91b6f4eed3fd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
@@ -80,10 +80,6 @@ static inline unsigned long __read_cr4(void)
 {
 	return PVOP_CALL0(unsigned long, pv_cpu_ops.read_cr4);
 }
-static inline unsigned long __read_cr4_safe(void)
-{
-	return PVOP_CALL0(unsigned long, pv_cpu_ops.read_cr4_safe);
-}
 
 static inline void __write_cr4(unsigned long x)
 {
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
index 7fa9e7740ba3..fcf243f077ac 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
@@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ struct pv_cpu_ops {
 	unsigned long (*read_cr0)(void);
 	void (*write_cr0)(unsigned long);
 
-	unsigned long (*read_cr4_safe)(void);
 	unsigned long (*read_cr4)(void);
 	void (*write_cr4)(unsigned long);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h
index 587d7914ea4b..19a2224f9e16 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h
@@ -59,22 +59,19 @@ static inline void native_write_cr3(unsigned long val)
 static inline unsigned long native_read_cr4(void)
 {
 	unsigned long val;
-	asm volatile("mov %%cr4,%0\n\t" : "=r" (val), "=m" (__force_order));
-	return val;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned long native_read_cr4_safe(void)
-{
-	unsigned long val;
-	/* This could fault if %cr4 does not exist. In x86_64, a cr4 always
-	 * exists, so it will never fail. */
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+	/*
+	 * This could fault if CR4 does not exist.  Non-existent CR4
+	 * is functionally equivalent to CR4 == 0.  Keep it simple and pretend
+	 * that CR4 == 0 on CPUs that don't have CR4.
+	 */
 	asm volatile("1: mov %%cr4, %0\n"
 		     "2:\n"
 		     _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 2b)
 		     : "=r" (val), "=m" (__force_order) : "0" (0));
 #else
-	val = native_read_cr4();
+	/* CR4 always exists on x86_64. */
+	asm volatile("mov %%cr4,%0\n\t" : "=r" (val), "=m" (__force_order));
 #endif
 	return val;
 }
@@ -182,11 +179,6 @@ static inline unsigned long __read_cr4(void)
 	return native_read_cr4();
 }
 
-static inline unsigned long __read_cr4_safe(void)
-{
-	return native_read_cr4_safe();
-}
-
 static inline void __write_cr4(unsigned long x)
 {
 	native_write_cr4(x);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
index dee8a70382ba..6fa85944af83 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct tlb_state, cpu_tlbstate);
 /* Initialize cr4 shadow for this CPU. */
 static inline void cr4_init_shadow(void)
 {
-	this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.cr4, __read_cr4_safe());
+	this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.cr4, __read_cr4());
 }
 
 /* Set in this cpu's CR4. */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
index 1acfd76e3e26..ed03b1c5b1b9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
@@ -332,7 +332,6 @@ __visible struct pv_cpu_ops pv_cpu_ops = {
 	.read_cr0 = native_read_cr0,
 	.write_cr0 = native_write_cr0,
 	.read_cr4 = native_read_cr4,
-	.read_cr4_safe = native_read_cr4_safe,
 	.write_cr4 = native_write_cr4,
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	.read_cr8 = native_read_cr8,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
index d86be29c38c7..e5da9ba220d1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, int all)
 	cr0 = read_cr0();
 	cr2 = read_cr2();
 	cr3 = read_cr3();
-	cr4 = __read_cr4_safe();
+	cr4 = __read_cr4();
 	printk(KERN_DEFAULT "CR0: %08lx CR2: %08lx CR3: %08lx CR4: %08lx\n",
 			cr0, cr2, cr3, cr4);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 98c9cd6f3b5d..4b01cc2d5151 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -1137,7 +1137,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	 * auditing all the early-boot CR4 manipulation would be needed to
 	 * rule it out.
 	 */
-	mmu_cr4_features = __read_cr4_safe();
+	mmu_cr4_features = __read_cr4();
 
 	memblock_set_current_limit(get_max_mapped());
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/power/cpu.c b/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
index b12c26e2e309..53cace2ec0e2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static void __save_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
 	ctxt->cr0 = read_cr0();
 	ctxt->cr2 = read_cr2();
 	ctxt->cr3 = read_cr3();
-	ctxt->cr4 = __read_cr4_safe();
+	ctxt->cr4 = __read_cr4();
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	ctxt->cr8 = read_cr8();
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
index b86ebb1a9a7f..e2cf8fcea6bb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -1237,7 +1237,6 @@ static const struct pv_cpu_ops xen_cpu_ops __initconst = {
 	.write_cr0 = xen_write_cr0,
 
 	.read_cr4 = native_read_cr4,
-	.read_cr4_safe = native_read_cr4_safe,
 	.write_cr4 = xen_write_cr4,
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/boot: Fix another __read_cr4() case on 486
  2016-09-29 19:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/boot: Fix another __read_cr4() case on 486 Andy Lutomirski
@ 2016-09-29 22:38   ` Borislav Petkov
  2016-09-30 10:43   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2016-09-29 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Lutomirski; +Cc: x86, david, Brian Gerst, linux-kernel

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:48:11PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> The condition for reading CR4 was wrong: there are some CPUs with
> CPUID but not CR4.  Rather than trying to make the condition exact,
> using __read_cr4_safe().

Please s/using/use/ while applying.

> Reported-by: david@saggiorato.net
> Fixes: 18bc7bd523e0 ("x86/boot: Synchronize trampoline_cr4_features and mmu_cr4_features directly")
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index 0fa60f5f5a16..98c9cd6f3b5d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -1137,9 +1137,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>  	 * auditing all the early-boot CR4 manipulation would be needed to
>  	 * rule it out.
>  	 */
> -	if (boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level >= 0)
> -		/* A CPU has %cr4 if and only if it has CPUID. */
> -		mmu_cr4_features = __read_cr4();
> +	mmu_cr4_features = __read_cr4_safe();
>  
>  	memblock_set_current_limit(get_max_mapped());
>  
> -- 

Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [tip:x86/urgent] x86/boot: Fix another __read_cr4() case on 486
  2016-09-29 19:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/boot: Fix another __read_cr4() case on 486 Andy Lutomirski
  2016-09-29 22:38   ` Borislav Petkov
@ 2016-09-30 10:43   ` tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski @ 2016-09-30 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits; +Cc: tglx, mingo, linux-kernel, hpa, brgerst, luto, bp

Commit-ID:  192d1dccbfc5b901b66527df9df80304693cf06e
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/192d1dccbfc5b901b66527df9df80304693cf06e
Author:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:48:11 -0700
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:37:40 +0200

x86/boot: Fix another __read_cr4() case on 486

The condition for reading CR4 was wrong: there are some CPUs with
CPUID but not CR4.  Rather than trying to make the condition exact,
use __read_cr4_safe().

Fixes: 18bc7bd523e0 ("x86/boot: Synchronize trampoline_cr4_features and mmu_cr4_features directly")
Reported-by: david@saggiorato.net
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8c453a61c4f44ab6ff43c29780ba04835234d2e5.1475178369.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 0fa60f5..98c9cd6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -1137,9 +1137,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	 * auditing all the early-boot CR4 manipulation would be needed to
 	 * rule it out.
 	 */
-	if (boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level >= 0)
-		/* A CPU has %cr4 if and only if it has CPUID. */
-		mmu_cr4_features = __read_cr4();
+	mmu_cr4_features = __read_cr4_safe();
 
 	memblock_set_current_limit(get_max_mapped());
 

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm: Get rid of __read_cr4_safe()
  2016-09-29 19:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/asm: Get rid of __read_cr4_safe() Andy Lutomirski
@ 2016-09-30 10:45   ` tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski @ 2016-09-30 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits; +Cc: mingo, tglx, hpa, linux-kernel, bp, brgerst, luto

Commit-ID:  1ef55be16ed69538f89e0a6508be5e62fdc9851c
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/1ef55be16ed69538f89e0a6508be5e62fdc9851c
Author:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:48:12 -0700
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:40:12 +0200

x86/asm: Get rid of __read_cr4_safe()

We use __read_cr4() vs __read_cr4_safe() inconsistently.  On
CR4-less CPUs, all CR4 bits are effectively clear, so we can make
the code simpler and more robust by making __read_cr4() always fix
up faults on 32-bit kernels.

This may fix some bugs on old 486-like CPUs, but I don't have any
easy way to test that.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: david@saggiorato.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ea647033d357d9ce2ad2bbde5a631045f5052fb6.1475178370.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

---
 arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h       |  4 ----
 arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h |  1 -
 arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h  | 22 +++++++---------------
 arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h       |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c            |  1 -
 arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c          |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/setup.c               |  2 +-
 arch/x86/power/cpu.c                  |  2 +-
 arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c              |  1 -
 9 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
index 2970d22..91b6f4e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
@@ -80,10 +80,6 @@ static inline unsigned long __read_cr4(void)
 {
 	return PVOP_CALL0(unsigned long, pv_cpu_ops.read_cr4);
 }
-static inline unsigned long __read_cr4_safe(void)
-{
-	return PVOP_CALL0(unsigned long, pv_cpu_ops.read_cr4_safe);
-}
 
 static inline void __write_cr4(unsigned long x)
 {
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
index 7fa9e77..fcf243f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
@@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ struct pv_cpu_ops {
 	unsigned long (*read_cr0)(void);
 	void (*write_cr0)(unsigned long);
 
-	unsigned long (*read_cr4_safe)(void);
 	unsigned long (*read_cr4)(void);
 	void (*write_cr4)(unsigned long);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h
index 587d791..19a2224 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h
@@ -59,22 +59,19 @@ static inline void native_write_cr3(unsigned long val)
 static inline unsigned long native_read_cr4(void)
 {
 	unsigned long val;
-	asm volatile("mov %%cr4,%0\n\t" : "=r" (val), "=m" (__force_order));
-	return val;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned long native_read_cr4_safe(void)
-{
-	unsigned long val;
-	/* This could fault if %cr4 does not exist. In x86_64, a cr4 always
-	 * exists, so it will never fail. */
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+	/*
+	 * This could fault if CR4 does not exist.  Non-existent CR4
+	 * is functionally equivalent to CR4 == 0.  Keep it simple and pretend
+	 * that CR4 == 0 on CPUs that don't have CR4.
+	 */
 	asm volatile("1: mov %%cr4, %0\n"
 		     "2:\n"
 		     _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 2b)
 		     : "=r" (val), "=m" (__force_order) : "0" (0));
 #else
-	val = native_read_cr4();
+	/* CR4 always exists on x86_64. */
+	asm volatile("mov %%cr4,%0\n\t" : "=r" (val), "=m" (__force_order));
 #endif
 	return val;
 }
@@ -182,11 +179,6 @@ static inline unsigned long __read_cr4(void)
 	return native_read_cr4();
 }
 
-static inline unsigned long __read_cr4_safe(void)
-{
-	return native_read_cr4_safe();
-}
-
 static inline void __write_cr4(unsigned long x)
 {
 	native_write_cr4(x);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
index dee8a70..6fa8594 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct tlb_state, cpu_tlbstate);
 /* Initialize cr4 shadow for this CPU. */
 static inline void cr4_init_shadow(void)
 {
-	this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.cr4, __read_cr4_safe());
+	this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.cr4, __read_cr4());
 }
 
 /* Set in this cpu's CR4. */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
index bef3400..bbf3d59 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
@@ -332,7 +332,6 @@ __visible struct pv_cpu_ops pv_cpu_ops = {
 	.read_cr0 = native_read_cr0,
 	.write_cr0 = native_write_cr0,
 	.read_cr4 = native_read_cr4,
-	.read_cr4_safe = native_read_cr4_safe,
 	.write_cr4 = native_write_cr4,
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	.read_cr8 = native_read_cr8,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
index 404efdf..bd7be8e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, int all)
 	cr0 = read_cr0();
 	cr2 = read_cr2();
 	cr3 = read_cr3();
-	cr4 = __read_cr4_safe();
+	cr4 = __read_cr4();
 	printk(KERN_DEFAULT "CR0: %08lx CR2: %08lx CR3: %08lx CR4: %08lx\n",
 			cr0, cr2, cr3, cr4);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 87f2330..3aabfdc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -1137,7 +1137,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	 * auditing all the early-boot CR4 manipulation would be needed to
 	 * rule it out.
 	 */
-	mmu_cr4_features = __read_cr4_safe();
+	mmu_cr4_features = __read_cr4();
 
 	memblock_set_current_limit(get_max_mapped());
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/power/cpu.c b/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
index b12c26e..53cace2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static void __save_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
 	ctxt->cr0 = read_cr0();
 	ctxt->cr2 = read_cr2();
 	ctxt->cr3 = read_cr3();
-	ctxt->cr4 = __read_cr4_safe();
+	ctxt->cr4 = __read_cr4();
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	ctxt->cr8 = read_cr8();
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
index b86ebb1..e2cf8fc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -1237,7 +1237,6 @@ static const struct pv_cpu_ops xen_cpu_ops __initconst = {
 	.write_cr0 = xen_write_cr0,
 
 	.read_cr4 = native_read_cr4,
-	.read_cr4_safe = native_read_cr4_safe,
 	.write_cr4 = xen_write_cr4,
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-30 10:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-09-29 19:48 [PATCH v2 0/2] CR4 fixes (one is urgent) Andy Lutomirski
2016-09-29 19:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/boot: Fix another __read_cr4() case on 486 Andy Lutomirski
2016-09-29 22:38   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-30 10:43   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2016-09-29 19:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/asm: Get rid of __read_cr4_safe() Andy Lutomirski
2016-09-30 10:45   ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox