From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: "Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
"Chris Wilson" <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>,
tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com, "Fei Yang" <fei.yang@intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellstrom" <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>,
mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com,
"Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Andi Shyti" <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>,
"Bruce Chang" <yu.bruce.chang@intel.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Daniele Ceraolo Spurio" <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Jason Ekstrand" <jason@jlekstrand.net>,
"John Harrison" <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>,
"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Matt Roper" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Ramalingam C" <ramalingam.c@intel.com>,
"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"Tejas Upadhyay" <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com>,
"Umesh Nerlige Ramappa" <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] Fix TLB invalidate issues with Broadwell
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 16:27:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1655306128.git.mchehab@kernel.org> (raw)
i915 selftest hangcheck is causing the i915 driver timeouts, as reported
by Intel CI bot:
http://gfx-ci.fi.intel.com/cibuglog-ng/issuefilterassoc/24297?query_key=42a999f48fa6ecce068bc8126c069be7c31153b4
When such test runs, the only output is:
[ 68.811639] i915: Performing live selftests with st_random_seed=0xe138eac7 st_timeout=500
[ 68.811792] i915: Running hangcheck
[ 68.811859] i915: Running intel_hangcheck_live_selftests/igt_hang_sanitycheck
[ 68.816910] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] Cannot find any crtc or sizes
[ 68.841597] i915: Running intel_hangcheck_live_selftests/igt_reset_nop
[ 69.346347] igt_reset_nop: 80 resets
[ 69.362695] i915: Running intel_hangcheck_live_selftests/igt_reset_nop_engine
[ 69.863559] igt_reset_nop_engine(rcs0): 709 resets
[ 70.364924] igt_reset_nop_engine(bcs0): 903 resets
[ 70.866005] igt_reset_nop_engine(vcs0): 659 resets
[ 71.367934] igt_reset_nop_engine(vcs1): 549 resets
[ 71.869259] igt_reset_nop_engine(vecs0): 553 resets
[ 71.882592] i915: Running intel_hangcheck_live_selftests/igt_reset_idle_engine
[ 72.383554] rcs0: Completed 16605 idle resets
[ 72.884599] bcs0: Completed 18641 idle resets
[ 73.385592] vcs0: Completed 17517 idle resets
[ 73.886658] vcs1: Completed 15474 idle resets
[ 74.387600] vecs0: Completed 17983 idle resets
[ 74.387667] i915: Running intel_hangcheck_live_selftests/igt_reset_active_engine
[ 74.889017] rcs0: Completed 747 active resets
[ 75.174240] intel_engine_reset(bcs0) failed, err:-110
[ 75.174301] bcs0: Completed 525 active resets
After that, the machine just silently hangs.
Bisecting the issue, the patch that introduced the regression is:
7938d61591d3 ("drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store")
Reverting it fix the issues, but introduce other problems, as TLB
won't be invalidated anymore. So, instead, let's fix the root cause.
It turns that the TLB flush logic ends conflicting with i915 reset,
which is called during selftest hangcheck. So, the TLB cache should
be serialized, but other TLB fix patches are required for this one
to work.
Tested on an Intel NUC5i7RYB with an i7-5557U Broadwell CPU.
Chris Wilson (6):
drm/i915/gt: Ignore TLB invalidations on idle engines
drm/i915/gt: Invalidate TLB of the OA unit at TLB invalidations
drm/i915/gt: Skip TLB invalidations once wedged
drm/i915/gt: Only invalidate TLBs exposed to user manipulation
drm/i915/gt: Serialize GRDOM access between multiple engine resets
drm/i915/gt: Serialize TLB invalidates with GT resets
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 10 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h | 3 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c | 37 ++++++++++++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 3 +-
5 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--
2.36.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-06-15 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-15 15:27 Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2022-06-15 15:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/gt: Ignore TLB invalidations on idle engines Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-06-16 7:21 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-06-23 11:04 ` Andi Shyti
2022-06-15 15:27 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/gt: Invalidate TLB of the OA unit at TLB invalidations Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-06-15 17:03 ` [Intel-gfx] " Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-06-23 11:07 ` Andi Shyti
2022-06-15 15:27 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/gt: Skip TLB invalidations once wedged Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-06-16 7:25 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-06-23 11:08 ` Andi Shyti
2022-06-15 15:27 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/gt: Only invalidate TLBs exposed to user manipulation Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-06-16 7:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-06-23 11:13 ` Andi Shyti
2022-06-15 15:27 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/gt: Serialize GRDOM access between multiple engine resets Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-06-16 7:35 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-06-23 11:17 ` Andi Shyti
2022-06-24 8:34 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-06-27 9:00 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-06-28 15:49 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-06-29 15:30 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-06-29 16:02 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-06-30 7:32 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-06-30 8:12 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-06-30 16:01 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-01 7:56 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-07-04 8:42 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-06-15 15:27 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/gt: Serialize TLB invalidates with GT resets Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-06-23 11:18 ` Andi Shyti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1655306128.git.mchehab@kernel.org \
--to=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris.p.wilson@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=fei.yang@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jason@jlekstrand.net \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com \
--cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
--cc=ramalingam.c@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
--cc=yu.bruce.chang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).