linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Yang <danielyangkang@gmail.com>
To: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jan Karcher <jaka@linux.ibm.com>,
	"D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: danielyangkang@gmail.com
Subject: 
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:48:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1729031472.git.danielyangkang@gmail.com> (raw)

Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:31:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2 RESEND] resolve gtp possible deadlock warning

Fixes deadlock described in this bug:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e953a8f3071f5c0a28fd.
Specific crash report here:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=CrashReport&x=14670e07980000.

This bug is a false positive lockdep warning since gtp and smc use
completely different socket protocols.

Lockdep thinks that lock_sock() in smc will deadlock with gtp's
lock_sock() acquisition.

Adding lockdep annotations on smc socket creation prevents these false
positives.

Daniel Yang (2):
  Patch from D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
  Move lockdep annotation to separate function for readability.

 net/smc/smc_inet.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.39.2


             reply	other threads:[~2024-10-15 22:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-15 22:48 Daniel Yang [this message]
2024-10-15 22:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/2 RESEND] resolve gtp possible deadlock warning Daniel Yang
2024-10-15 22:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/2 " Daniel Yang
2024-10-16  0:03   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-16  0:24     ` Daniel Yang
2024-10-16  0:30       ` Daniel Yang
2024-10-22  2:00   ` D. Wythe
2024-10-16  1:27 ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1729031472.git.danielyangkang@gmail.com \
    --to=danielyangkang@gmail.com \
    --cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).