From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 073F9331A5D for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2026 10:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767695078; cv=none; b=tyMGyaDqLMofuJJZfTyBxQcsuSzKVmmbegiQCh4vKu/xCSMozNHPJRSFX+uQHK9SSOzNQ7pY1tbMSLfqqjncDJCUnZAs7Z9VgqrgY7FSqQQCIywvcxbnJH9QzI6MPHr62nu9FPcan6Ec2H4zc0kPb+3ybmsy4GQ2DxEQp2XD5Os= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767695078; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ldlkWSqDczOWRin0nu0RNzcTGMNDwzDC8Yf+RXa/cgU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=EiLYnrAP2YDSYmzfKuhLgMh/TwGT2Fnwo4eTvNo0ii9U6fEuQS7nlyUCPC7ER4N9DAqlT3u/llQYOdXX352Xvbuvapv7G3FZqYkJ8TWMlPLYJOm0XGNBXbBHZkVZDkZWIM8CDJEWZOcgaYi1uXX6xOvMJmnJ6we/0aRX6qCJoyg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=g5u14A4y; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="g5u14A4y" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DDB1C16AAE; Tue, 6 Jan 2026 10:24:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1767695077; bh=ldlkWSqDczOWRin0nu0RNzcTGMNDwzDC8Yf+RXa/cgU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=g5u14A4yUZIxUVkxN6BJTi25K1u8E34zmRN/uupJr0IYSWd52zLASg35cZsydYbpj AND0S7BE/G6g/jSJ3wWQg1PydIsODpWfGCCNotiYQc8pnAIj+/uYBV7quAE+OwvG0V 0N0bYXNm1k1iX1IuErzkbhIKn+0mbXrdr6dkUbe/0UL3fPEfjJpQGN3E1Sv14NNHr6 HoRbojObIeEXsh/eYbNdmU/Aok6dxJDDHH67mBsxSl2psXD2mknXqf0a5u74s6txW7 Wer0S88V6/TbxYn5j+TL/v0NBjpY3zBrBPM4VsonRJNA58DAsVyJeUoP1adtEgkWmn gCG7sGqm7roWg== Received: from mchehab by mail.kernel.org with local (Exim 4.99) (envelope-from ) id 1vd4Et-000000009O3-3LTP; Tue, 06 Jan 2026 11:24:35 +0100 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Ard Biesheuvel , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/1] Update CPER maintainership Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 11:24:25 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.52.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Hi Ard/Rafael, This is a suggestion, so I'm marking it as a RFC. At least on my eyes, and looking at the discussions on this thread: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251222091334.5cb8465f@foz.lan/ It sounds to me that the better would be to have the code under cper* maintained together with APEI code, as the main source of CPER records is via APEI/GHES. So, at least on my eyes, people maintaining and reviewing should be the same - or a superset of what's currently there. The patch on this series: 1. Add cper* files to APEI; 2. remove them from EFI - mostly to avoid having two maintainers for the same file. Another option would be to do just (1), keeping the CPER files listed on two maintainers' entries. Comments? Regards, Mauro Mauro Carvalho Chehab (1): MAINTAINERS: add cper to APEI files MAINTAINERS | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) -- 2.52.0