[PATCH] exfat: Fix 2 issues found by static code analysis

[Philipp Hahn <phahn-oss@avm.de>]

Hello,

I'm going through our list of issues found by static code analysis using Klocwork.
It found two issues worth fixing:

1. The 1st seems to be a real bug due to C's integer coercion, where the
   inverted bitmask `s_blocksize` gets 0 extended.
2. The 2nd might just be a dead variable assignment, but maybe `num_clusters`
   is supposed to be returned or stored elsewhere?

I hope my alaysis is correct. If yes, please apply. Thank you.

Philipp Hahn (2):
  exfat: Fix bitwise operation having different size
  exfat: Drop dead assignment of num_clusters

 fs/exfat/dir.c   | 2 +-
 fs/exfat/inode.c | 1 -
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0