From: "Ionut Nechita (Wind River)" <ionut.nechita@windriver.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de, bvanassche@acm.org, clrkwllms@kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, ming.lei@redhat.com, muchun.song@linux.dev,
mkhalfella@purestorage.com, chris.friesen@windriver.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
ionut_n2001@yahoo.com, sunlightlinux@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 0/1] block/blk-mq: use atomic_t for quiesce_depth to avoid lock contention on RT
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 09:56:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1778048987.git.ionut.nechita@windriver.com> (raw)
Hi Jens,
This is v6 of the fix for the RT kernel performance regression caused by
commit 6bda857bcbb86 ("block: fix ordering between checking
QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED request adding").
Changes since v5 (Mar 3):
- Rewrote the memory-ordering comments per Bart Van Assche's review.
The previous wording incorrectly described smp_mb__after_atomic() as
ordering against "subsequent loads in blk_mq_run_hw_queue()". The
comments now describe the actual reader/writer pairing: writer-side
smp_mb__after_atomic() in blk_mq_quiesce_queue_nowait() and
blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() pairs with reader-side smp_rmb() in
blk_mq_run_hw_queue() so the re-check observes the latest
quiesce_depth value.
- Rebased on top of linux-next (next-20260505).
- No functional / code-generation changes.
Changes since v4 (Feb 13):
- Rebased on top of linux-next (20260302)
- No code changes
Changes since v3 (Feb 11):
- Rebased on top of axboe/for-7.0/block
- Fixed Fixes tag commit hash to match upstream (6bda857bcbb86)
- Added Reviewed-by from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
- No code changes
Changes since v2 (Feb 10):
- Replaced raw_spinlock_t quiesce_sync_lock with atomic_t for
quiesce_depth, as suggested by Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
- Eliminated QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED entirely; blk_queue_quiesced() now
checks atomic_read(&q->quiesce_depth) > 0
- Use atomic_dec_if_positive() in blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() to avoid
race between WARN check and decrement
- Removed the unrelated blk_mq_run_hw_queues() async=true change
- Removed blk-mq-debugfs.c QUIESCED flag entry
- Uses smp_mb__after_atomic() / smp_rmb() for memory ordering instead
of any spinlock in the hot path
Changes since v1 (RESEND, Jan 9):
- Rebased on top of axboe/for-7.0/block
- No code changes
The problem: on PREEMPT_RT kernels, the spinlock_t queue_lock added in
blk_mq_run_hw_queue() converts to a sleeping rt_mutex, causing all IRQ
threads (one per MSI-X vector) to serialize. On megaraid_sas with 128
MSI-X vectors and 120 hw queues, throughput drops from 640 MB/s to
153 MB/s.
The fix converts quiesce_depth to atomic_t, which serves as both the
depth tracker and the quiesce indicator (depth > 0 means quiesced).
This eliminates QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED and removes the need for any lock
in the hot path. Memory ordering is ensured by smp_mb__after_atomic()
on the writer side (after modifying quiesce_depth) paired with
smp_rmb() on the reader side (before re-checking quiesce state in
blk_mq_run_hw_queue()).
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20260303073744.20585-1-ionut.nechita@windriver.com/
Ionut Nechita (1):
block/blk-mq: use atomic_t for quiesce_depth to avoid lock contention
on RT
block/blk-core.c | 1 +
block/blk-mq-debugfs.c | 1 -
block/blk-mq.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
include/linux/blkdev.h | 9 ++++---
4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
--
2.54.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-05-06 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-06 6:56 Ionut Nechita (Wind River) [this message]
2026-05-06 6:56 ` [PATCH v6 1/1] block/blk-mq: use atomic_t for quiesce_depth to avoid lock contention on RT Ionut Nechita (Wind River)
2026-05-06 7:14 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-05-06 7:47 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-05-06 9:43 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1778048987.git.ionut.nechita@windriver.com \
--to=ionut.nechita@windriver.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=chris.friesen@windriver.com \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=ionut_n2001@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=mkhalfella@purestorage.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sunlightlinux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox