From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
To: ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, david.e.box@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
michael.j.ruhl@intel.com, ayaz.siddiqui@intel.com,
syed.abdul.muqthyar.ahmed@intel.com,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, hansg@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/1] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Notify userspace when crashlogs complete
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 18:08:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1794444671.git.david.e.box@linux.intel.com> (raw)
This patch adds a uevent so userspace can find out when an Intel PMT
crashlog is available without polling.
It emits a KOBJ_CHANGE uevent on the crashlog<x> device carrying
INTEL_PMT_CRASHLOG_COMPLETE. The value is 1 when a completed crashlog is
found at probe, or when a manually triggered capture completes. The value
is 0 when a manual trigger does not complete within the 5 second poll
window. The ABI documentation is updated to match.
The main change in v3 is that the probe-time check no longer reads the
crashlog registers from probe. The register access callbacks added by
Michael's "platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add register access callbacks"
(7fdfccf87676) are there for the upcoming xe support for Crescent Island
(CRI). That support implements read_reg() and holds the lock it takes
across intel_vsec_register() when it registers late, after its firmware
is ready. With pmt_crashlog already loaded, crashlog probe runs
synchronously inside that call, and the v2 probe-time read deadlocked on
the lock its own caller held. Michael found this on CRI. In v3 the check
runs from a work item, which waits for registration to finish.
One rule follows from this and is noted in the code: a parent must not
hold its read_reg() lock while removing the crashlog device, because
remove waits for these work items. The CRI xe code only removes the
device under that lock if devm_add_action_or_reset() fails inside
intel_vsec_add_aux().
Testing: Michael tested v3 on CRI hardware. It was also tested in QEMU
on a kernel with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, covering the cases listed for v2
plus disabling the crashlog during the trigger poll. A test parent
driver modelled the CRI late-bind path: read_reg() callbacks under a
mutex held across intel_vsec_register(), a slow registration that keeps
the lock held after the device appears, and a trigger that reaches
control_mutex before the probe-time check.
Tool use: an LLM coding assistant was used to analyze the deadlock,
draft the changes and the QEMU tests, and review the patch with
sashiko. I reviewed and tested the result.
V3 changes:
- Run the probe-time check from a work item queued at the end of
probe instead of from probe, so a read_reg() callback is never
called from a synchronous probe that may run under the parent's
lock (reported and tested by Michael on CRI).
- Queue the probe-time check on the freezable workqueue, like the
poll (sashiko).
- Enable triggers once probe has created every entry, rather than per
entry, so abort_probe never waits on a work item blocked on its
caller's lock.
- If a trigger is accepted before the probe-time check runs, the
check skips its notification. The trigger's poll reports the
capture, so it is not also reported as found at probe.
- Disabling the crashlog while the trigger poll runs ends the poll
without an event, like clear and rearm (sashiko).
- ABI: note that events may be merged, list writing 0 to trigger and
disabling as ending the poll, and update Date and KernelVersion.
- Rebased onto review-ilpo-next. The patch also applies cleanly to
for-next.
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1792721526.git.david.e.box@linux.intel.com/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261001220351.1592138-1-david.e.box@linux.intel.com/
David E. Box (1):
platform/x86/intel/pmt: Notify userspace when crashlogs complete
.../ABI/testing/sysfs-class-intel_pmt | 35 ++++
drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/crashlog.c | 180 +++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 209 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
base-commit: 5680519168f65666d2c03cc6ed8fe2b7052aee12
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 2:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 2:08 David E. Box [this message]
2026-11-12 2:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Notify userspace when crashlogs complete David E. Box
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1794444671.git.david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--to=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ayaz.siddiqui@intel.com \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=syed.abdul.muqthyar.ahmed@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox