From: Yingjie Wang <x-professor@outlook.com>
To: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai@fygo.io>, Li Nan <magiclinan@didiglobal.com>,
Xiao Ni <xiao@kernel.org>,
Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com>,
"linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] md/raid5: fix PPL disk add and replacement removal
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2026 07:39:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1794555233.git.x-professor@outlook.com> (raw)
This is v2 of the two independent PPL disk-transition fixes. The first
patch is unchanged. The second patch also handles a slot that remains
assigned above the current array width after a RAID5 shrink.
When a newly added disk fails PPL setup, raid5_add_disk() can publish the
private disk pointer before the caller rolls back raid_disk. A later
removal can then free the disk while RAID5 still references it. Patch 1
prepares the PPL log before publishing the pointer and restores the
previous state on failure.
Patch 2 keeps the active PPL log attached when an unpromoted replacement
is removed. It also skips log_modify() when removing an active device from
a slot at or above the current raid_disks value. Such a slot has no PPL
child log after a shrink, but its device pointer still has to be cleared.
Changes in v2:
* guard the active-device log update with number < conf->raid_disks;
* add a shrink test that leaves an extra slot blocked, enables PPL, and
compares the v1 and v2 removal results.
The v1 public thread is:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1794215128.git.x-professor@outlook.com/
Tested on x86_64 with KASAN, PROVE_LOCKING, DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP, LOCKDEP,
MD, and RAID456 enabled:
* per-commit W=1 builds for both commits;
* failed PPL disk addition, which reaches DONE on the v2 tip;
* unpromoted replacement removal, which reaches PASS and DONE on the
v2 tip, with tracing observing `ppl_write_stripe()` and a successful
return during a subsequent array write;
* the shrink comparison, where the sent v1 remains at slot 3 after
three remove attempts while v2 removes the slot on the first attempt;
* empty-header `-EIO` injection while adding a spare, where `slot=0`
returns an error, leaves the slot unassigned, restores `ppl_size`, and
leaves the degraded array writable.
The runtime tests use native metadata 1.2. IMSM external metadata was not
run. The empty-header failure uses a dedicated kernel with
`CONFIG_FAIL_MAKE_REQUEST` enabled; the separate page-allocation `-ENOMEM`
injection was not run.
Yingjie Wang (2):
md/raid5: roll back failed PPL disk additions
md/raid5: preserve active PPL log when removing a replacement
drivers/md/raid5-ppl.c | 11 ++++++++++-
drivers/md/raid5.c | 13 +++++++++----
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
base-commit: 47e1b18f38d74015cb9fd30b5ff2a1eb88e77d31
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-11-15 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-15 7:39 Yingjie Wang [this message]
2026-11-15 7:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] md/raid5: roll back failed PPL disk additions Yingjie Wang
2026-11-15 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] md/raid5: preserve active PPL log when removing a replacement Yingjie Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1794555233.git.x-professor@outlook.com \
--to=x-professor@outlook.com \
--cc=artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magiclinan@didiglobal.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xiao@kernel.org \
--cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox