Re: [PATCH] kernel/printk.c lockless access

David Wagner
2005-01-09T22:33:04Z

Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
>What about UDP (or just eth) broadcasting the oops and catching it
>on another system?

For security reasons, it better be optional and disabled by default.
(That should be easy enough to ensure, so this is obviously not something
to stand in the way of doing something like this.)