public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Whatever happened to the real mode driver idea?
@ 2005-01-10 21:19 Bill Davidsen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Bill Davidsen @ 2005-01-10 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

There has been some discussion of some "universal real mode" driver to 
allow hardware without an open source driver to operate with Linux. It's 
been about a year since this came up, and as I recall the last 
discussion ended with people opposed to using that as a reverse 
engineering tool, due to possible legal issues.

But I have a technical question, wouldn't a real mode use of BIOS code 
be more secure that the current situation of tainted drivers running in 
the kernel? Please take political discussion elsewhere, I'm curious 
about the safty issue, not the legal or advocacy issues.

Being an old MULTICS guy, my first though when protection rings came out 
was that the drivers should be out of ring zero.

-- 
    -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
  last possible moment - but no longer"  -me

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2005-01-11  0:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-10 21:19 Whatever happened to the real mode driver idea? Bill Davidsen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox