Re: [PATCH v4] scripts/x86/intel: Add a script to update the old microcode list

[Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>]

On 1/30/2026 2:00 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 30/01/2026 7:47 pm, Sohil Mehta wrote:
>> +# Functions to extract family, model, and stepping
>> +def bits(val, bottom, top):
>> +    mask = (1 << (top + 1 - bottom)) - 1
>> +    mask = mask << bottom
>> +    return (val & mask) >> bottom
> 
> return (val >> bottom) & mask
> 

Yup, that is better. Saves an extra step/line.


>> +# Prepare the microcode entries
>> +ucode_entries = []
>> +for ucode_key in ucode_dict:
>> +    rev = ucode_dict[ucode_key]
>> +    sig = rev['sig']
>> +    ucode_entries.append({
>> +        'family': family(sig),
>> +        'model': model(sig),
>> +        'steppings': 1 << step(sig),
>> +        'platforms': rev['platforms'],
>> +        'rev': rev['rev'],
>> +        'sig': sig
>> +    })
> 
> This is crying out for a small class, and for the use of set()
> 

> Try the attached version, which is rather more pythonic.

Thank you for improving the script. It looks cleaner and "pythonic". It
works for my usage with unique ucode files in a single directory.

Dave probably has a use case where he passes multiple directories to the
script. IIUC, the new version just inserts a unique entry for every FMS
+ pf_mask and skips the repeats. But it doesn't necessarily use the
latest revision for the duplicates. We probably need an equivalent logic
for this:

    if existing is not None:
        # If the existing one is newer, just move on:
        if existing['rev'] > rev['rev']:
            continue

Dave, opinion?