public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: chenzhangqi79@163.com, jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: chao@kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chenzhangqi@xiaomi.com,
	Zhijun Li <lizhijun3@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V0 RESEND] f2fs: fix error map extent flag while block not allocated
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:40:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0b32f14-114b-4f18-94eb-fa83fc611cff@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250113055702.1347172-1-chenzhangqi79@163.com>

Hi Zhangqi,

On 1/13/25 13:57, chenzhangqi79@163.com wrote:
> From: Zhangqi Chen <chenzhangqi@xiaomi.com>
> 
> In the function f2fs_fiemap, when returning the file
> map extent flag, the flag of the delayed allocation
> block is set to FIEMAP_EXTENT_UNWRITTEN . At the same
> time, the phy address of the file map extent reassigned
> to 0 because it is not a valid address.
> 
> In this way, the file map extent with address 0 and
> FIEMAP_EXTENT_UNWRITTEN flag returned by ioctl, and
> may be used for writing by userspace programs, thereby
> destroying the superblock of the file system.

I agree with you.

FYI, there is a previous patch as below:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20230405144359.930253-1-chao@kernel.org/

It seems such change will fail some testcases of xfstest, have you check
this patch w/ 009, 092 and 094 in tests/generic/?

Thanks,

> 
> As mentioned in /Documentation/filesystems/fiemap.txt,
> FIEMAP_EXTENT_UNWRITTEN should mean that the block has
> been allocated but not filled with data. However, the
> actual situation in f2fs is that there is no allocated
> block, so it should be changed to FIEMAP_EXTENT_UNKNOWN
> and FIEMAP_EXTENT_DELALLOC.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Zhijun Li <lizhijun3@xiaomi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhijun Li <lizhijun3@xiaomi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhangqi Chen <chenzhangqi@xiaomi.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 2ec0cfb41260..a945d1f1d40c 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -2023,7 +2023,7 @@ int f2fs_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
>  				size += F2FS_BLKSIZE;
>  			}
>  		} else if (map.m_flags & F2FS_MAP_DELALLOC) {
> -			flags = FIEMAP_EXTENT_UNWRITTEN;
> +			flags = FIEMAP_EXTENT_UNKNOWN | FIEMAP_EXTENT_DELALLOC;
>  		}
>  
>  		start_blk += F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(size);


      reply	other threads:[~2025-01-22 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-13  5:57 [PATCH V0 RESEND] f2fs: fix error map extent flag while block not allocated chenzhangqi79
2025-01-22 11:40 ` Chao Yu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d0b32f14-114b-4f18-94eb-fa83fc611cff@kernel.org \
    --to=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=chenzhangqi79@163.com \
    --cc=chenzhangqi@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizhijun3@xiaomi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox