Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree

Adam Sampson
2005-03-05T09:58:17Z

Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> writes:

> - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things
> marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, or a real security issue.

So a trivial patch that fixed a data corruption issue wouldn't be
accepted?

--
Adam Sampson <azz@us-lot.org> <http://offog.org/>